Kathleen Stock is celebrating the victory of reason over gender myth-making in the British courts:
Another big problem for transactivist campaigners was the restricted arsenal of argumentative weapons at their disposal. They couldn’t rely on reason or evidence as these concepts are commonly understood, because no good arguments for transubstantiation by means of lip gloss existed. This left only three options: intellectual misdirection, emotional blackmail, and aggressively shaming opponents into silence.
It’s right to celebrate but that it should have taken years and an extraordinary amount of effort to prove that men don’t belong in women’s jails and changing rooms is in itself quite sad.
Since people like talking about diabetes, this was lunch:
These are fish kotlety hiding under the parsley. I love parsley and eat it by the bunch.
For kotlety, I found two nice trays of catfish fillets at $5.99 a tray, which is very low for our landlocked area. I put them through the grinder with boiled carrots, garlic, and some leftover quinoa. Added an egg and baked them in pork rind crumbs.
Because the left sets the narrative, that’s why. Nazism is a crime of the (far) right. USSR is a crime of (an equally far) left. Pretty much all of the world intellectuals of the twentieth century were in some way collaborating with the USSR or the regimes sponsored by it. Think of any name, and there’s a 90% chance that writer, thinker, academic, dancer, muralist, philosopher, etc was buying drinks with Soviet money.
Yes, there are exceptions but culture is built by networks. If you haven’t carefully and painstakingly woven a net, you won’t catch any butterflies. The international Left was nourished by the Soviet colossus for 70 years. It got so powerful that it could write the story of everything. And nobody had a platform to say otherwise and be heard.
But the best part? Once the USSR fell apart, the United States of America took over the financing of the international Left. The transition was very seamless, very smooth. And America has much more money. Many more leftists could be funded around the world. Many more projects could be filled to the brim with ready cash.
This is why leftism became much more aggressive AFTER the fall of the USSR. That’s why it reached the heights of lunacy that the Soviets couldn’t dream of. I mean, the worst that the Soviets could force scientists to parrot was that oak branches can sprout out of a birch tree. And even that required thousands of academics to be shot dead or jailed. The post-Soviet leftism, in the meantime, made scientists, Prime Ministers, and every cultural authority declare that women have penises. And without a single shot fired. Step aside, Comrades. The real power is in town.
P.S. To the sweet person who asked my opinion on crypto, thank you for the trust but I sincerely know nothing whatsoever on the subject. I have outsourced everything related to finance to my husband who is a whiz and somehow manages to materialize free business class tickets to Europe (aside from free UberEats meals, free Lyft rides, free Casa del Libro books, free toiletries, etc).
The NYTimes released an article that finally recognizes the enormous disconnect between the science on ADHD and the daily practice of treating it with stimulants:
I’ve spent the last year speaking with some of the leading A.D.H.D. researchers in the United States and abroad, and many of them, like Swanson, express concern over what they see as a disconnect between the emerging scientific understanding of A.D.H.D. and the way the condition is being treated in clinics and doctors’ offices. Edmund Sonuga-Barke, a researcher in psychiatry and neuroscience at King’s College London, described the situation in personal terms. “I’ve invested 35 years of my life trying to identify the causes of A.D.H.D., and somehow we seem to be farther away from our goal than we were when we started,” he told me. “We have a clinical definition of A.D.H.D. that is increasingly unanchored from what we’re finding in our science.”
One more quote from the article because it’s paywalled and I want to share at least the most crucial parts:
That ever-expanding mountain of pills rests on certain assumptions: that A.D.H.D. is a medical disorder that demands a medical solution; that it is caused by inherent deficits in children’s brains; and that the medications we give them repair those deficits. Scientists who study A.D.H.D. are now challenging each one of those assumptions — and uncovering new evidence for the role of a child’s environment in the progression of his symptoms.
And just one more:
Some scientists have begun to argue that the traditional conception of A.D.H.D. as an unchanging, essential fact about you — something you simply have or don’t have, something wired deep in your brain — is both inaccurate and unhelpful. According to Sonuga-Barke, the British researcher, the traditional notion that there is a natural category of “people with A.D.H.D.” that clinicians can objectively measure and define “just doesn’t seem to be the case.”
The facts on ADHD come out in the exact pattern as facts about COVID. People who contradict the propaganda narrative are screamed down, vilified, and accused of wanting to murder grandma. Then, after a while, everything such people said gets recognized as true but no amends are made and no recognition of mistakes made is offered.
There is a large number of absolutely deranged beliefs held by the American public on matters of health. One example is the belief that the extraordinary rates of obesity in the US are “genetic” and utterly unconnected to food quality and eating habits. Another one that I encountered only last week is that people eat sugary breakfast cereals after being diagnosed with diabetes because doctors tell them to eat a high-carb diet with this disease.
Other such beliefs I will not name because I honestly don’t need the drama that will inevitably ensue. All that the NYTimes article says I’ve known for a long time because it’s very easy to find. It’s as easy to find as “don’t eat sugar by the spoonful if you have diabetes” but people will still be shocked when these facts are revealed.
Dude, I’m so traumatized, I walk around dark as a storm cloud in May. Yes, Llosa was 89 but still. Did I mention that I met him in person? I mean, I know I did, but have I mentioned it recently? A hard-working person and a truly great writer, even if his personal life was very ridiculous (see HERE and also HERE. And HERE, as well).
My favorite by Vargas Llosa is The War of the End of the World. But it’s 772 pages of nightmarish, incandescent saga about a religious cult in Brazil. I also love The Green House but it’s very postmodern, and you need to be into South American postmodernism to get it.
I will probably use the writer’s death as an excuse to reread The War of the End of the World. This summer will be exactly 20 years since I read it, and I still shake with delight as I think of it.
Government-mandated conservative hires at elite universities is no way to shift the culture in your favor and will only breed resentment. The right was just starting to win the culture war and now is spectacularly overplaying its hand.
Whose resentment and how come those people aren’t resentful already?
We are in an unequal war where one side goes scorched-earth at every opportunity while another is terrified of overplaying its hand before even beginning to play.
I told this story before but I will repeat it in light of the Abrego García scandal.
In 2008-9 I was working as a Visiting Assistant Professor at Cornell University. My contract there was to end on May 15, 2009. My new contract at my current university was to start on August 15 of that same year. I was at that time a citizen of Canada, which means I can enter the US without a visa as a tourist.
In March of 2009, I started receiving phone calls from Homeland Security, telling me that I had to remove myself from the country on May 15 when my work contract expired. This meant I had to leave on May 15, then re-enter as a tourist (because I wanted to be with N who was working in Baltimore), then leave again and re-enter on August 15 under my new work contract. This was very inconvenient and entailed a lot of expense that I could ill-afford.
However, it was the law of the US. I respected the law and did everything legally. Left, came back, left again, and came back again. I could have easily disregarded these requirements and nobody would have hunted me around to deport me. But it would have been illegal. I don’t do illegal shit. I strongly believe that this is the only correct and moral attitude to life.
N lived for 2 years in the US on a visa that allowed him to reside but not work. He could have easily worked illegally and nobody would have known. He got requests galore for some off-the-books work. He didn’t even consider them and lived off his savings, spending everything he had managed to save. Yet between the two of us, it wasn’t even a question whether to accept work without the correct immigration status. We didn’t even discuss it, it was so obvious to both of us that we weren’t going to break the law. You know how much money he could have made in those two years? A lot. But it wasn’t even tempting because it would have been illegal.
Clarissa's Blog 