I started reading what seemed a reasonable article on the complexities of bringing American manufacturing back. The argument seemed to make sense until it degenerated into the favorite neoliberal idea about the low quality of Americans compared to other, more adequate humans:
Chinese manufacturing labor isn’t just cheaper. It’s better.
In China, there are no people who are too fat to work. The workers don’t storm off midshift, never to return to their job. You don’t have people who insist on being paid in cash so that they can keep their disability payments, while they do acrobatics on the factory floor that the non-disabled workers cannot do.
Chinese workers much less likely to physically attack each other and their manager. They don’t take 30 minute bathroom breaks on company time. They don’t often quit because their out-of-state mother of their children discovered their new job and now receives 60% of their wages as child support. They don’t disappear because they’ve gone on meth benders.
https://x.com/Molson_Hart/status/1908940952908996984?t=iSCBRb-Ecf8jTQRB7p5gFw&s=19
It goes on in that vein but I think we get the general idea. The only conclusion we can draw from the description of these utterly horrible, useless Americans is that things would be enormously better if they could be replaced by better-quality humans.
It’s interesting that nobody ever explains when exactly Americans went so bad. Was it before, during or after their jobs were shipped overseas? Were they always such exceptionally low-quality people or is this a new development?
By the way, I found the link on Curtis Yarvin’s X account. He’s wealthy and doesn’t like Trump’s tariffs. I’m mentioning this to inject some complexity into people’s thinking.
Also, for additional complexity, the quote I posted is an almost verbatim rendering of parts of JD Vance’s autobiography.