From Freddie de Boer’s blog:
if you’re looking for something to meaningfully move your child around in the academic performance spectrum, to take an X percentile kid and make him an X+Y percentile kid, the answer is no, what you’re asking me about doesn’t work, won’t matter, isn’t worth it. Because outside of some very specific and rare scenarios like schooling a child who has received literally no formal education or removing a kid from extreme neglect or abuse, nothing substantially changes the average kid’s place in the performance spectrum. Academic outputs are dominantly student-side and uncontrollable, based largely on genetics, conditions in the womb, and the “unshared environment,” which is our awkward term for that big chunk of variation we can neither explain nor control.
That is absolutely 100% true. The reason to take a kid to robotics (if the kid really wants to go) or any other extracurricular is so that the kid has fun.
You can’t change a kid’s IQ. At all. But you can do something much more important. Imagine looking into a mirror your whole life and seeing a strikingly beautiful woman or a sensationally good-looking man every single time. Imagine living with a feeling that the world is conspiring in your favor, that everything will turn out just right for you because you are that kind of person. Who needs academic outputs if you can have that?
This is what we can give our children.
People get stuck on these stupid academic outputs like they can make anybody happy.
