I have no idea why people are obsessed with regime change like it’s something bad. Is it because of Iraq and Libya? But those are savages, of course they messed it up.
Look at the 15 republics of the USSR, though. Look at the Warsaw Pact countries. They all experienced dramatic regime change far beyond Iraq. And it was fantastic. Or is there anybody here who wishes the USSR continued until now?
Germany regime-changed in 1945 and turned into a wonderful, civilized country. Even Mexico pulled off an excellent regime change in 1910, although being Mexico and all it did take 20 years and a civil war to make it stick. Spain regime-changed beautifully in 1975. The US achieved one of the most remarkable regime changes in history in 1776.
I don’t think that we should invade anybody to effect regime change. I’m against people invading other people. But that’s why I say I’m against invasions. I don’t say I’m against regime change. Because that’s a weird and random thing to oppose. Do you believe that people should be stuck for eternity in a regime that doesn’t work for them? Why? Because of one situational fail in one stupid Iraq?
Honestly, it’s not even the belief itself that annoys me but people’s eagerness to repeat these fake expressions without even trying to ask what they mean. I despise the use of verbal clichés.

