It’s Not About Your Daddy

The racial situation is getting so charged that even intelligent people are failing to find an adequate tone. The usually brilliant Ta-Nehisi Coates has come out with the following disturbing slip of the tongue:

For activists and protesters radicalized by the killings of Michael Brown and Eric Garner, this weekend’s killing may seem to pose a great obstacle. In fact, it merely points to the monumental task in front of them. Garner’s death, particularly, seemed to offer some hope.

I love Coates’s journalism but I can’t make myself go on reading. (I know he didn’t mean it the way it sounds but it still came out like this, and it sounds absolutely horrible.)

And then there are individuals who are trying to use tragedy to promote their writing careers by publishing screeds like the following one:

You are not going to stop. We understand that. Your inability to share and your fear of retribution goads you to try even harder to solidify your power. Making us, from America to Australia to West Papua, dependent upon you for food, (terminator seeds, anyone?) water (a commodity?), and a place to be, (What? You say you ‘control’ this land? But I live here!) Pushing your doctrine-driven education, not for the wonder of knowledge but to corral us into a self-defeating way of life that serves only you. Fomenting fear and hatred and violence because it pays so well. (And is so effectively distracting.)

I believe that it was an enormous mistake to attach the murder of Michael Brown to the very silly narrative of bad, mean, “militarized” police forces. Wafer wasn’t police, Zimmerman wasn’t police, and there are many other killers who weren’t police. This isn’t about police or anybody’s unresolved Daddy issues. This is about racism.

Now a murderer goes and kills two police officers because we were all collectively so freaked out about what was actually going on that we substituted what was happening with an extraneous narrative. Yes, the murderer would have killed no matter what anybody else did. Still, the officers are dead and we are all now engaged in a debate of how everybody feels about police, which ultimately is about nothing other than the degree of everybody’s psychological health. 

Now everybody can publicly indulge in the delightful exhibition of their psychological wounds. “Police can do no wrong” and “police are all evil” are not opposing positions. They are actually exactly the same and stem from a single root. What people who are making both statements (or any variation thereof) are actually saying is, “My father complex is so problematic that it makes me want to explode from the inside!” 

Trayvon Martin is dead. Michael Brown is dead. Rafael Ramos and Wenjian Liu are now also dead. But the esteemed public is still in the grip of its father complex and can talk of nothing else.

From A Russian Radio Station

These are some of the things that I just heard on Russia’s most progressive radio station:

“Protests against the unfair elections took place not only in Moscow but also in Russia.”

“For a very long time, many people couldn’t fulfill their dream of moving to Moscow because housing was very expensive in the city. Now, however, this dream has become accessible to anybody. Our company sells cheap, luxurious cottages starting at only $200,000.”

“Great Britain is repenting the huge mistake it made when it allowed all those dark-skinned folks who have recently been let out of their cages in Africa to move to the country. These people should have stayed in their zoos instead of coming to a civilized country and destroying it. I’m sure everybody noticed that the darker your skin is, the likelier you are to be dirty, rude, and mean to others.”

None of the programs that contained these statements tried to be humorous or parodic. This was all said completely in earnest. And I didn’t even try the really hardcore ultra-nationalistic stations.

Ask me again why I don’t hang out with people from my country.

Where Do the Canadian Racists Go?

A friend forwarded this article on Martin Luther King, Jr. to me without a comment. When I first started reading it, I thought it was a reprint from a piece written decades ago. Then, I noticed the date and decided it was a parody of a profoundly offensive, racist piece of writing. And then I realized that it was not. This was written in all seriousness yesterday.

There was a dark side to King and it should not be ignored. Its effects continue to plague our society. Contrary to popular myth, the Baptist minister was a hypocrite who consistently failed to uphold his professed Christian standards. His rampant adultery and serial, life-long womanizing revolted even some of his closest associates. Large parts of his doctoral dissertation were plagiarized. He had numerous ties with communists and Soviet sympathizers. Then-FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover knew this, which is why he considered King a “fraud.”

Moreover, King was a radical leftist. He promoted socialism, pacifism and the appeasement of totalitarian communism. He opposed the Vietnam War and even openly supported the Viet Cong and North Vietnam’s Marxist dictator Ho Chi Minh, praising them as anti-imperialists battling Western occupying powers. Yet, these Soviet-backed communists would eventually impose a murderous police state upon the Vietnamese.

And this isn’t even the most racist part of the article. King was to blame for all these things we normally consider part of the legacy of slavery:

King’s socialism also convinced many blacks to adopt welfare liberalism. It transformed them into a permanent Democratic constituency. The results have been disastrous. The nanny state has crippled the black community, undermining self-reliance, entrepreneurship and personal responsibility. It has fostered family breakdown, soaring rates of illegitimacy and trapped millions in a cycle of poverty and urban squalor. King showed blacks the way out from segregation, but he led them to an economic plantation.

So if you see black people living in poverty and squalor, you know whom to blame: MLK.

I researched Jeffrey T. Kuhner, the author of this vile piece of garbage, and discovered, to my horror, that he is from Montreal and even taught history at my alma mater, McGill University, at one time. The same time when I was a student there, actually. Good thing I never enrolled in one of his courses by mistake.

So if you are wondering why Quebec is less racist than the US, now you know. The racists all leave and go to write for the American newspapers.