You never fail to discover stunning revelations in the works of some literary critics:
If “the sexual pattern of arousal and release” characterizes only male libido, then what is female libido supposed to be like?
It would be great if literary critics left the study of libido to sexologists and did not share their own weird understanding of human sexuality in their articles. I’m now distracted from working on my manuscript by trying to figure out what this (normally very talented and insightful) critic was trying to say about female libidinal economy.
