Rate this:
Share this:
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
Clarissa's Blog 
Where did this come from and is there a bigger picture? The small print is hard to read.
LikeLike
Press Ctrl + to make it bigger.
I found it on a Ukrainian website.
LikeLike
Huh. What does it mean in practical terms for the “Uralic” section of the tree to be away from the “Indo-European” one?
LikeLike
They are quite a fascinating phenomenon. These are Indo-European languages spoken in Eurasia but they are very different from the rest of the European languages. They are a phenomenon onto itself.
LikeLike
They don’t share a common ancestor (not that linguists agree about anyway).
LikeLike
Finno-Ugric are not Indo-European
LikeLike
“not Indo-European”
Though they just may both be Nostratic…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nostratic_languages
Though I’ve never heard of Semitic languages like Arabic or Hebrew belonging to Nostratic and have heard of one version that includes Eskimo-Aleut(!)
There also used to be a theory connecting Finno-Ugric and Dravidian which I liked.
LikeLike
There is still a huge debate going on about this that has acquired strangely ideological overtones.
LikeLike
So are the words at the end supposed to be languages or language families? I can tell you that “Deccan” is not a language.
LikeLike
Well, strictly speaking, neither are many of the other families mentioned in the chart, German contains 7 mutually incomprehensible dialects, modern Italian as we know it is an invented language from the dialects of the Italian peninsula. So
I vote for families.
LikeLike
Emphasis on North-Germanic and Finno-Ugric languages convincingly proves this was done by a Finnish person. 🙂 I’ve seen these scheme before, and at that time it was clearly attributed to a Finnish person. Whose name I of course not remember…
LikeLike
It’s by Minna Sundberg, who writes the webcomic Stand Still, Stay Silent – try there for larger versions etc., I think (and to appreciate the reason for the kitties, not that all explanatory charts wouldn’t be improved by the addition of kitties)
LikeLike
And from the web-comic point of view, the inter-understandability of speakers of Finnish, Danish, Swedish, Norwegian and Icelandic is very important, as it means that several of the main characters can only speak to each other via an intermediary (or mime/guessing/interpretation of actions), which leads to both comedic and dangerous situations…
LikeLike
Following fluffymog’s post, here’s a link to the original: http://sssscomic.com/comic.php?page=196
It’s a much larger version, and the first paragraph of artist’s comments below it has some explanation on where the information comes from.
LikeLike
Hebrew was not included, right?
LikeLike
It’s not an Indo-European language. Yiddish, though, definitely is.
LikeLike