The Seven Lame Ducklings Debate

Let me preface this by saying, Republicans, please vote for Trump. Because Cruz is iffy. He’s weird, something’s wrong with him.

20:07 – Rubio thinks he is running against Obama. The poor puckered up fellow is so clueless.

20:08 – Bush is trying to crack a joke and fails, as usual.

20:12 – asking the perennially Peter-Pannish Rand Paul about his Daddy is a low blow.

20:15 – I’m still not entirely sure how Kasich’s last name is pronounced. Or what his first name is. That’s not a good sign re: his popularity.

20:18 – again with milking the ISIS thing? Will they ever speak of this country that they profess to love so much? Hello, wage stagnation over here! College debt! Underemployment! Enough with the freaking “carpet bomb the enemy” already.

20:27 – Christie looks like he is about to cry with big, slobbering, heaving sobs.

20:28 – Cruz is such a bully.

20:32 – yes, let’s discuss terrorism anxiety and pretend that economic anxiety does not exist. A great way to remain completely irrelevant, guys.

20:36 – Megyn Kelly is not letting Christie fib about San Bernardino. Good for her!

20:38 – Carson is trying to sub for Trump with a “political correctness is evil” spiel.

20:50 – of course, Cruz will be fine with people losing their health insurance. He’s a smug, rich, grubby sociopath.

21:01 – Fox News is beating up Rubio real bad on immigration.

21:07 – the spectacle of immigrants’ sons competing in which one of them hates immigrants more is disgraceful. Do none of them have any balls to defend their own positions they’ve espoused for years?

21:13 – at least, Bush managed to squeeze out something positive about immigrants.

21:32 – Rand Paul is a religious libertarian? What a joke he is. I especially love his “the abortions WE have.” Maybe the freak should stop having all these abortions if they bother him so much.

21:35 – Fox News must think Putin is beyond irrelevant if they give the quest about him to Carson.

21:43 – this debate is a joke. They are on to Bill Clinton’s sex life? Seriously? There is no greater problem in this country than Bill’s affair 20 fucking years ago? People who were born in that year are old enough to vote. Can we discuss their college bills and not Bill’s penis?

72 thoughts on “The Seven Lame Ducklings Debate

  1. “Rubio thinks he is running against Obama.”

    Probably because Hillary clearly campaigning to carry on Obama’s third term…

    Like

  2. ‘They want to trigger an apocalyptic armageddon showdown so we will…give them an apocalyptic armageddon showdown by carpet bombing”.

    Like

    1. They keep repeating this same stuff in every debate. It’s like they have zero interest in what is happening in this country.

      It’s not surprising that the party is collapsing.

      Like

  3. “the perennially Peter-Pannish Rand Paul”

    Yes, but he and Debbie Wasserman Schultz have the same unique hair style, so their images are always entertaining.

    Like

  4. “let’s discuss terrorism anxiety and pretend that economic anxiety does not exist”

    The candidates are simply addressing the questions actually being asked, instead of turning every answer into economic inequality like Bernie does in the Demo debates.

    Like

  5. It’s ridiculous to talk about repealing Obamacare — or any other big government program already in place! The best anyone can do to existing government programs in slow down their growth.

    Like

  6. These idiots seem to think that Planned Parenthood and Foreign Aid are the biggest items in the budget.

    “How will you balance the budget?”
    “DEFUND PLANNED PARENTHOOD! NEXT QUESTION!”

    Like

      1. I stand with Rubio and wholeheartedly oppose Barack Hussein Obama’s official ‘Let ISIS into the country’ immigration policy.

        Like

  7. Puerto Rico is never going to vote to become a U.S. state — the island has a much better deal remaining an unincorporated U.S. territory.

    Like

  8. Kelly is quite confrontational: “Now that you’ve already proved that you can’t be trusted on this subject…” 🙂

    Like

  9. “Let’s watch Rubio age.Also here’s raw material for all of the other PACs.”
    You are Cuban. Your parents got “blanket amnesty”.

    Like

  10. It’s John Kay-sich. I don’t have any idea of what he would be like as far as foreign affairs, but domestically, he would be like GW Bush (as you may recall, he is my governor).

    He only looks good on that stage because the others are so, so bad.

    Like

  11. Christie: I will be the Matlock of the federal government. I will be the prosecutor and the POTUS at the same time

    Like

  12. Off-topic, but has everyone noticed how the volume on commercials is always much louder than during the programs? Very annoying!

    Like

        1. Well you did not grow up here in the time before remotes. When I was a child, it must have been a developmental milestone of sorts, the moment you realized the commercial are louder and are able to comment on it.

          Like

      1. “Did you just start watching television?”

        I was watching television before you were born, but changes in noise levels are much more jarring as you get older, because you have to set the minimum noise level a bit higher to understand conversation against background noise.

        Stick around a few decades, you’ll see what I mean. 🙂

        Like

        1. changes in noise levels are much more jarring as you get older, because you have to set the minimum noise level a bit higher to understand conversation against background noise

          A bit higher? Ha!

          I think they actually did jack up the volume level on certain commercials. It’s not just your ears.

          Like

          1. “The Commission adopted rules on December 13, 2011 that require commercials to have the same average volume as the programs they accompany” (from the link you provided).

            Those rules are definitely being violated.

            “A bit higher? Ha!”

            I think you misunderstood me. What I meant was, I personally have to set the volume on my television a little higher than I did forty years ago, because as you age your high-frequency hearing slowly decreases, and when it dips into the range of human conversation, words are harder to understand against background noise.

            So I have to set the volume higher for shows like “Law & Order,” which have a lot of background noise, than I do for political talk shows.

            The sudden increase in volume when a commercial starts is definitely more than a bit, no argument about that.

            Like

      1. Sorry about the stupid name mix-up — but you didn’t answer my question: Do you disagree with anything Dr. Carson said about Putin?

        (Replying that what he said is irrelevant because he’ll never be President is dodging my question.)

        Like

        1. It’s all completely outdated. The time to send weapons to Ukraine passed over a year ago. The situation is different now. What will help is to push France hard to stick to the sanctions. Putin needs to be shown that his presence in Syria is not wanted. And the comments he made today about Russia’s claims to even more of Ukraine’s territory need to be shut down.

          Carson’s speech would have made sense in the summer of 2015 but you can’t just get stuck in the past. New developments happen all the time.

          Like

          1. NATO exercises and a troop build-up in the Baltic states are still a good idea. Putin’s bullying isn’t welcome either in Syria or Eastern Europe. Obama’s never stood up to him anywhere.

            Like

              1. NATO leadership depends on the United States. There hasn’t been any for the last eight years.

                Like

  13. 21:43 – this debate is a joke. They are on to Bill Clinton’s sex life? Seriously? There is no greater problem in this country than Bill’s affair 20 fucking years ago? People who were born in that year are old enough to vote. Can we discuss their college bills and not Bill’s penis?

    The Starr Report is the best argument against government created porn.

    Like

    1. The Starr Report came out right after I moved to Canada. My relationship with my husband was collapsing, I was depressed, but reading that report was so entertaining that I felt relief. I will forever remember it fondly. 🙂

      Like

      1. As long as we’re reminiscing: The Lewinsky scandal broke the week after I retired from the Air Force — the first week in ages that I’d been home to watch daytime television on weekdays. It was also the week that Pope John-Paul became the first-ever Pope to visit Cuba, and it would have been a very boring news week without the scandal. 🙂

        The impeachment trial was also a very entertaining week, even if the melodrama had a disappointing ending.

        Like

        1. Yes, I traveled to Cuba soon after that and they were all crazy for him. I don’t think Cubans cared much whether to adore the Pope or Che Guevara.

          One thing is for sure, though, being young is vastly overrated. I wouldn’t want to go back to that age.

          Like

  14. Why did they invite Paul and not Fiorina? It was all “Paul the Lesser’s greatest hits!”.

    Notes from the peanut gallery:
    “Go back to Jersey, shovel some snow and eat some pasta!”
    “Rubio’s face is red on one side and has a scratch on it. What’s up with his makeup?”
    ” [poor baby]” (said about Bush)
    “I like Kasich.”
    “Ok chant Hillary’s name one more time” (to Rubio)

    Like

    1. “Why did they invite Paul and not Fiorina?”

      Because they needed at least one person on the stage whose foreign policy views were to the left of Obama’s.

      Like

  15. “this debate is a joke.”

    I agree! The candidates should have been attacking Hillary, not each other.

    We’ll see who’s still standing, in both parties, after the Monday caucus.

    Like

  16. Tangentially:
    Maybe it’s the candidates or this year or me, but there’s a distinct lack of dreaming and an overall positive vision for the future coming out of the entire 2016 field.

    The Republican candidates claim they’re going to protect me the nightmare of Hillary Clinton dealing with ISIS and socialism. The Republican field is a nightmare to me, but I just notice the lack of even a positive conservative vision with any tangibility. I don’t have a sense of a conservative vision except oh, “This is a rerun of the 1980s.”

    The Democratic candidates claim they’re going to protect me from the Republicans. Sanders sort of has a positive vision but it feels like a throwback in every single way. Otherwise, why soundtrack your political ad with the melancholy Simon and Garfunkel song<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W773ZPJhcVw“>America (see the lyrics at the link)? Hillary Clinton is very much, “did you like the ’90s? Did you like Obama? If you elect me, you’ll get more of that!”

    2016: It’s So Hard To Say Goodbye To Yesterday LOL

    Like

    1. I agree completely. I’m tempted to attribute this to the age of the leading candidates but then I see Rubio who is young yet as apocalyptic as the rest of them.

      Like

Leave a reply to Barbara Cancel reply