To illustrate the preceding paradox, let’s look at the Crazy Baker drama that played out last year and is likely to keep playing out for a while to come. Free-market right-wingers defined “freedom” as the right not to sell. At the same time, anti-free-market left-wingers defined freedom as the right to buy.
For the free-marketers, following the market dictates of responding to demand with supply was, all of a sudden, intolerable.
For the anti-free-marketers, a tiny and insignificant limitation on their capacity to buy was, all of a sudden intolerable.
Both sides, however, avoided discussing what was happening in terms of consumerism. Both, instead, took it to the realm of morality. Hence, both must agree that morality = exchange of money and goods.
I thought free markets meant something else, and that this was about discrimination.
LikeLike
I’ll let Emo Philips explain it to you:
http://www.theguardian.com/stage/2005/sep/29/comedy.religion
LikeLike
I like all the religious jokes. And I am tired of’ people who have no sense of humor.
LikeLike
A little humor is healthy!
LikeLike