And now I finally read this article on Trump and women that everybody is talking about. What a ridiculous, pathetic piece of tabloid garbage this article is. There is nothing in it but a collection of entirely anodyne, boring anecdotes that have zero meaning whatsoever. Gosh, one could easily find much juicier stories about me, if they wanted to. Ooooh, he told somebody she must love candy, what a horrible insult! Let’s all clutch our pearls on cue. What rot!
If anything, this article will attract people to Trump because the only conclusion one can draw is that if this is the extent of Trump’s “sexism”, then what are we all even talking about?
Are people not noticing how stupid this all is? They are trying to discredit Trump by revealing that back in 1990 he asked somebody to wear a swimsuit by the poolside. That evildoer.
Clarissa's Blog 
Have you seen a copy of the printed New York Times newspaper? That article ran as HEADLINE NEWS on the front page.
LikeLike
Yes, I have it. It’s beyond ridiculous. I was prepared for shocking revelations only to find stories about how he praised his mother for being understanding of his father’s long work hours. It’s embarrassing they’d print something like this.
LikeLike
I’d have thought most people would be talking about the rape accusation, especially since it’s not the only one that’s been made against Trump.
LikeLike
This is old news, though. This was all discussed back in the summer, and the ex-wife said she didn’t mean it, it was just a way of speaking. Who knows what their marital games were like, especially if she now says it’s all good.
LikeLike
Zero meaning? Not really.
But it doesn’t really add any new information to what we know of Trump. We already know he’s a loudmouth braggart who thinks the hotness of the women around him reflects on him, and comments accordingly. If that didn’t bother you before, why would it now?
LikeLike
If he were a kind, gentle, super respectful ultra feminist, that would not make him in the least bit more qualified to be president. He’s unqualified not because he’s an unpleasant fellow but because, as Obama said the other day, he doesn’t know anything about anything.
LikeLike
True.
But being a living example of Dunning-Kruger isn’t a disqualification to be POTUS in many people’s eyes; it’s a bona fide asset.
LikeLike
Exactly! This article will only attract more fans. 😦
LikeLike
Interesting take RE Trump:
О демонстративном потреблении, потлаче, налогах и Дональде Трампе
http://scholar-vit.livejournal.com/472263.html
LikeLike
Great post. I agree completely.
LikeLike
Yeah, interesting theory — that Trump won’t release his tax information because he’s not nearly as rich as he pretends, and thus his whole public persona is a fraud.
LikeLike
Ah, you are a secret speaker of Russian. 🙂
LikeLike
Yeah, the KGB taught me when I was stationed in Germany!
Actually, the Google “translate” feature worked remarkably well for that article (sometimes its automatic translations are gibberish).
LikeLike