One thing that never gets old is listening to a conference session based on the ideas and concepts that I developed. When young scholars start on about the neoliberal promotion of migration as an unalloyed good, the weakening of the nation-state and why it’s bad, the enormous advantages that neoliberalism offers to some and the suffering it brings to others – all of it spiced up with quotes from yours truly – it feels nice.
The US students want to virtue-signal, the others want to discuss matters of substance, or substance that matters.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“The US students want to virtue-signal”
I’d say it’s more performative and aspirational status and class signalling. They (mostly subconsciously) feel that if they project the attitude of those without undue material worries they have a better chance at making it…
LikeLike
You are absolutely right. So, they are aping the higher-class virtue-signallers.
LikeLike
When I was a kid my mother was very strict about using Standard Correct English– no Y’all or Ain’t or other regional/class markers. I deliberately switch back and forth with my kids because I want them to learn both standard middle-class English and the lower-class local dialect, and be able to switch back and forth between them. There are two reasons for this: 1) Locally, it’s easier to get strangers to help you if you “sound local”. 2) I am afraid the upper classes (including the professional types who use standard english and signal all the right political virtues) are headed for a massive, ugly reckoning in this country, and I can imagine a time in the near future where being able to use the regional dialect easily and naturally could be a distinct advantage. I want my kids to be able to “code switch” when the situation calls for it.
LikeLike
I’m sorry, the previous comment was supposed to go under the “Curious difference” post.
LikeLike