See how nobody is calling you a sausage? That’s probably because you are not a sausage.
People don’t even realize what they are doing when they make these statements. It’s become so natural to them. It’s not about what things are. It’s about what you call them.
Clarissa's Blog 
It was not a sham trial. Trump’s trial was not a sham trial either. Each deserved the guilty plea.
But in today’s politics, we’re always seeking equivalent where none is required.
LikeLike
A trial in which nobody can articulate what the crime was. You know, it’s absolutely fine to be a libtard and still admit that the trial was a sham.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Thirty-seven felonies!” people say with big, round eyes.
“What were they?” I ask innocently.
“Well, you know,” they say. “I’m not sure but FELONIES.”
LikeLike
If we would like for criminal trials not to be itemized in such a way as to maximize the penalty, then we should make that case. I always found it ridiculous that prosecutors would often deliberately break crimes into little pieces and charge them independently. With Trump, he had 37 felonies because he had 37 checks written to cover his hush money scheme (set up to prevent him from losing the election). Why not just charge him with that one crime? There were even conversations in the media about whether he’d be convicted only for the ones he signed, and acquitted on the others. In the end, he was guilty of all.
It’s ridiculous, but not because it’s Trump. It’s ridiculous, period. And plenty activists for criminal reform have mentioned this for years, and no one said or did anything about it. But all of a sudden, because Trump got caught in it, now it’s no longer fair. That’s also ridiculous. Like everyone else, he’d have a chance to appeal, and if something is wrong, it will be overturned.
Now, let’s change the ridiculous law, and free the many thousands of people it has wrongly sent to jail. And if it covers Trump too, let him benefit.
LikeLike
Stacking charges might be a problem, not taking a position on that.
But the objection is not that the charges were split, it is that there wasn’t an identified crime. Paying blackmail (hush money if you like) is not a crime.
LikeLike
As most legal folks have explained, it becomes a felony if it was done in service of another crime. And the crime here was an unreported in-kind political donation to his campaign above the threshold. As I understand it, it’s not just the hush money he and Cohen schemed, but also the one he did with National Enquirer just so the bad information isn’t public. If Biden had falsified business records to keep Hunter Biden’s laptop story away from the media, that would have been a felony too.
It’s actually not that hard to understand for those who want to know.
LikeLike
Ah, the old “you would agree with me if you weren’t so stupid” argument. It’s rarely persuasive.
LikeLike
It’s the “you’d understand if you were willing” argument.
LikeLike
Things are not a sham just because we disagree with it or can’t understand it.
LikeLike
Sure. But that’s not Clarissa’s position.
LikeLike
Right, so … rhyming Britslang time!
Bangers and mash? CASH!
And “not a sausage”?
Used to mean only being broke, somewhere over the years became synonymous with having nothing of any kind, not just cash.
The same concept in Yankslang is now “nothingburger”, which is considerably more recent.
As for some journos jumping on these visuals?
Yeah, nothingburger, it’s not only that there’s no story, but also that there’s no news.
Oh, but I’m supposed to feel something for this bullshit?
Yeah, right in the Chevy Chase!
LikeLike