Pakistani Rape Gangs

I wrote about Pakistani rape gangs in the UK back in 2014. It’s good that the tragedy of these victims is being discussed in the mainstream but solving this terrible issue will take more than discussion.

One positive development is that the new Tory leader is Kemi Badenoch who is very black and, hence, openly says that some cultures are superior to others. Now we need people to be able to say what Badenoch does without the protection of race. The British experiment with bringing crowds of savages and unleashing them on the native population has been a disaster. Anybody who wants to object to the word “savages” needs to go read the court transcripts and then come here and explain what happened to their moral compass that they can witness such horrors and not be able to name them.

I spent years being harassed by precisely such savages in Canada. And OK, I wasn’t a child, lucky me, so I only experienced inconvenience, humiliation, and discomfort. But as I’ve been saying for 15 years here on the blog, there are so few places on the planet where you can just go about your day, unmolested and surrounded with politeness and normal behavior. We are mighty lucky to be in such places, created for us by the extraordinary work and self-betterment of preceding generations, and we are pissing it all away.

People have published a lot of good analytical pieces about the rape gangs. The rapists come from highly inbred societies, they are tribal, they abuse high-trust societies, they can’t peacefully coexist with our culture’s love for individual freedom. This is all true but the main thing is that they should be exactly how and what they want – tribal, clannish, rapey – back home. The importance of mass migration for the economy was a myth judging by the endless austerity in the UK.

12 thoughts on “Pakistani Rape Gangs

  1. The horror of the Rotherham story is of course about the cowardice and failure of British institutions. But it’s also about the underlying policy that necessitated the systematic mendacity in which the whole system engaged — mass immigration of a population about whom the absolute worst slander that a genocidal bigot could invent turned out to be a factual description of what hundreds of them were actually doing

    Liked by 1 person

      1. Clarissa

        “We are mighty lucky to be in such places, created for us by the extraordinary work and self-betterment of preceding generations, and we are pissing it all away.”

        Yeah, I am currently hearing problems in western Canada similar to those which you described in Montreal years ago. The problem is not just importing immigrants on a scale that is proving difficult to assimilate, the cultural beliefs of many appear very unlikely to integrate with earlier immigrants.

        Worse, as you observed there is clannish inbred character. The former is normal, groups of new immigrants naturally tend to stick together, the latter is not. Deliberately trying to seek a first cousin spouse is scientifically idiotic. Western civilization learned to avoid line breeding many centuries ago, other than of course among the aristocracy…what do you think of Chucky the third ;-D

        Liked by 1 person

        1. It even spread to Western Canada! That’s really sad.

          Words can’t describe how angry I was at the #MeToo scandals at Montreal’s Concordia University which sits in the midst of a neighborhood where Muslim men have harassed women within the inch of their lives for over two decades. Yet we were supposed to be scandalized by the story of some woman whose white boyfriend didn’t help her get published.

          Liked by 1 person

  2. One positive development is that the new Tory leader is Kemi Badenoch

    Yeah, I’m not sure. The conservatives have been worse on immigration, if such a thing could even be possible. I’ll believe them when I see them act.

    Like

  3. I started looking at Wesley Yang‘s Substack and saw the following disturbing post. Clarissa, what do you think?

    In Israel mothers only get paid parental leave of 15 weeks, after which many children go to full time daycare. At which age did Klara go to a kindergarten? Do you think for very young kids it’s better to pay a nanny?

    https://wesleyyang.substack.com/p/universal-early-childhood-daycare

    QUOTE

    Universal Early Childhood Daycare Has Been Proven to Damage the Children Who Have Been Through It

    And may be at the root of the ongoing and growing child mental health crisis

    The worst effects of daycare are seen in pre-verbal babies, infants under age one who attend full time center-based care, and whose home environments are not substandard. (For deprived children in substandard homes, attending an admittedly-hard-to-find “high-quality” daycare is better than no daycare at all.)  But for non-deprived children growing up in average homes, the small cognitive advantages of attending early daycare (relative to home-reared peers) fade over time, increasingly outweighed by deficits in “non-cognitive” skills, that not only persist but worsen.

    “Cognitive” skills can be taught in a classroom: meanings of words, names of colors, rules of conduct, basic facts. “Non-cognitive” skills determine our capacity for acquiring cognitive skills: when we fail, do we get frustrated and give up, or do we try again? Positive personality traits turn out to be even more important to later life success than cognitive skills— qualities like confidence, persistence, focus, agreeableness, and emotional self-regulation.

    A heavily subsidized universal daycare project that launched in Quebec in 1997, with impacts analyzed in 2015, provides stark evidence of the ’non cognitive’ harms of early center-based care.

     

    Like

    1. Klara started daycare at 8 months but it was twice a week for 4 hours. She mostly just slept through it all.

      On the other hand, I was homeschooled until age 7 while my sister was in full-time daycare since 11 months, and she’s always been better than me on non-cognitive skills.

      Like

      1. \  my sister was in full-time daycare since 11 months, and she’s always been better than me on non-cognitive skills.

        Thank you. It’s calming a bit. Though putting a 3 month old baby into full-time daycare feels different from 11 month old.

        Like

        1. Yes, 3 months old is definitely too early. Why would anybody want to? One is useless for work anyway until the baby is closer to a year. I wrote not a word before Klara’s first birthday. I was simply physically incapable.

          Again, physiology can’t be obviated.

          Like

          1. \ Yes, 3 months old is definitely too early. Why would anybody want to? One is useless for work anyway until the baby is closer to a year. 

            It’s not the case of want to, but of must do for financial reasons.

            Female teachers at my school tend to return to work after 3 months. One teacher, a single mother, who gave birth after the age of 40, came to work several times with a baby during the first 3 months too since she was responsible for all 12th grades and came to supervise when they had special activities at school. Another teacher told how she came to work after giving birth to a pre-term baby, who had to stay at the hospital, since her students were just before their math bagrut exam. So she travelled between hospital and school.

            Doing research is different from teaching or other usual jobs. You have probably taught students before Klara was 1.

            So, if you had to choose, would you prefer to hire a nanny at this age?

            Like

            1. Yes, I taught, 3 hours twice a week. I wasn’t very effective, to be honest.

              But to be honest, if somebody tried to make me be present at work for more than that, I would have taken an unpaid leave for a year.

              Like

Leave a comment