The Politico Scandal

I’m particular fascinated by which governmental agencies were sponsoring Politico with taxpayer money’s

Extraordinary stuff.

With the Soviet newspaper “Pravda” at least we knew it was government press and treated it accordingly.

29 thoughts on “The Politico Scandal

    1. (WP just ate two comments, attempting to post link to Shellenberger on X, who is explaining some fascinating financial papertrails, in addition to eating one earlier with a link to a really priceless Bill Kristol/datarep exchange)

      Like

    1. For sure. This is where the investigation needs to be. But I seriously doubt we’ll see any movement here because it benefited the rich class a lot.

      But no, let’s instead focus on a subscription to a magazine.

      Liked by 1 person

  1. wow a subscription to a a professional policy intelligence magazine in Washington DC? How outrageous!!

    Some of you are so impresionable. Elon Musk makes around $4 million per hour. That’s way more outrageous.

    Like

    1. Looking for “Dow Jones” to see how much the government pays for the Wall Street Journal is an easy way to see if this spending is similar to their subscription costs for other news sources.

      Like

    2. A subscription to the tune of $8 million? By the government? Without which the publication can’t exist? Am extremely ideological publication with far-left views? Paid for with your and my money to spread propaganda?

      If this is normal, then we’ve really reached a nadir.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. Oh, and it was multiple subscriptions through multiple government agencies:

        https://x.com/DOGE/status/1887277159947117027

        Half a mil in NASA subscriptions to Politico. I wonder what the total government sponsorship will turn out to be, both as a number, and as a proportion of various “media” outlets’ budgets.

        Waiting with anticipation to see how my guesses match up with the actual numbers– and it’s *so exciting* that the actual numbers are going public 😀

        I mean, the big outlets so in lockstep with controlling the narrative this last decade or so… is it really possible that they’ve been staying afloat *entirely* on Ozempic ads?

        Like

          1. Figures. What’ll be interesting to find out is if there were any MSM outlets that *weren’t* getting backdoor subsidies from the govt. Bet some of the “right-branded” outlets are in there too.

            Like

    3. Dude. If the government’s “subscription” is most of the operating budget, and they can’t pay their employees without it, it was not a “professional policy intelligence magazine”, it was a propaganda outlet.

      Like

    1. I do wonder if it’s just… like the thing with Canada, Mexico, and tariffs: not what he’s actually shooting for, but more of a bold opening salvo to get other countries, such as the Arab nations, to start taking some ownership of the problem (if only to avoid a scenario where the US has a giant military base there).

      Like

    2. IIRC the education thing is a bid to kick administration of public education back down to the state level, and get the federal government out of that game entirely. It would not be eliminated, but it would have a lot more local accountability. I think it would be a good thing, and would allow states that *want* to improve the quality of public schools, to do so unencumbered by federal money, with federal strings attached. There is a big problem, even in places that used to have pretty good schools, where once you accept a federal grant for anything, all of a sudden you have to comply with ten million federal regulations, all of which are very expensive and require extra levels of admin, without doing anything for students, teachers, or academic performance. If we’re going to have a public school system at all, in the future, we are going to have to shuck a lot of administrative bloat, and make schools more accountable to parents. Getting control of the purse strings away from the fedgov is not a bad start.

      Like

Leave a reply to Stringer Bell Cancel reply