The authorities in the province of Nova Scotia in Canada banned people from hiking or camping in the woods. Or going to the woods at all for any purpose. Because it’s unsafe.
The authorities in the city of London, Great Britain, painted lilac stripes on pavements to prevent bikers from robbing passersby. Pedestrians are supposed to use the lilac stripes as reminders that roving gangs of criminals ride around with impunity.
It’s curious how safety has come to mean that activities of law-abiding people should be curtailed. Authorities don’t want to combat crime. They want to constrain people who don’t do any crime.
Clarissa's Blog 
Reminds me a little bit of:
LikeLiked by 1 person
methylethyl
LOL ;-D
LikeLiked by 1 person
The trails in Nova Scotia are closed because of wildfire risk during a severe drought, though. I agree that they went way too far with it, but it wasn’t because of safety. It sounds like they’re concerned about campfires and cigarette butts starting fires.
LikeLike
Yes, safety from fire. Instead of catching the bastards who set fire, they prevent law-abiding people from going into the woods. It’s obvious that an arsonist won’t heed this warning. Only people who weren’t going to set fires in the first place will.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Instead of catching the bastards who set fire”
Yes, the meta-message of both is: We’re not here to provide services or help you. You’re own your own.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My Canadian uncle who died in 2022 had lived his whole life on the edge of a wood in Nova Scotia. His whole lifestyle was about that. Taking that away from people who have ancestral traditions tied to it is insane. I don’t want to keep saying the word neoliberal but I don’t have a better term for it. The government became anti-people. In particular, anti good, law-abiding people.
LikeLike
Clarissa
LOL, I have a very jaundiced outlook on most politicians, but wildfire risk is not a hill that anybody should choose to die upon. Both your uncle and myself could gauge that by scent, particularly in coniferous bush. Various forestry services do that scientifically by measuring(weighing) the humidity of a known amount of fuel. But nobody can accurately assess the potential wildfire risk of ignorant people in the woods in a hot, dry August ;-D
LikeLike
I wonder how the woods managed to survive all the millennia when there were no bureaucrats to bar access to them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well there appears to have been some deliberate burning near the prairies to increase game animals. But human numbers were so few that this supposed “game management” did little damage ;-D
LikeLike
“nobody can accurately assess the potential wildfire risk”
I think the real issue is the government doesn’t want to ‘waste’ resources on things like forest management or fighting fires….
Neoliberals don’t like spending money for anything that doesn’t make (them) money.
LikeLiked by 1 person
In Canada, the territorial or provincial authorities are elected to, among other duties, manage Crown lands i.e., public land. The last thing that thoee governments want to do is to lose the monies collected from fees and licenses to use those lands ;-D
LikeLike
those governments
LikeLike
Just as every time someone gets shot, the people in charge want to take guns away from everyone who didn’t do it.
LikeLiked by 2 people