A Racist Fad

~ Clarissa

My friends, your boy Newsom is a racist.

He’s openly saying that states with tiny black populations are superior. Ay yay yay.

I’m seeing on social media that this has become fashionable with Democrats. They gleefully list states with large black populations and explain what hell holes such states are. It’s disturbing.

It’s quite fascinating that people who like nothing more than to accuse everybody of racism would engage in this racist behavior. “We population-replaced California blacks, and rah rah, look how much better everything is. Hitler made trains run on time.”

Very sad and distasteful.

Unknown's avatar

Published by Clarissa

36 thoughts on “A Racist Fad”

  1. Many US citizens who vote Democrat and who ate quite proud of it (they call it “being on the right side of history”) have never lived with or in proximity of Black Americans. They have little to no knowledge of African-American culture, customs and society.

    For many Democrats, the only contact they have with Blacks is through the domestic staff they employ and that’s enough for them to feel that they are black people’s saviours.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

    2. “many Democrats, the only contact they have with Blacks is through the domestic staff they employ”

      When? In the 1950s? Hispanics (maybe augmented by a few from the Caribbean and Eastern Europe) pretty much completely displaced Blacks from most domestic staff positions.

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply

      1. cliff arroyo

        You are right: I meant, if they have any contact with blacks, it is if they have black domestic staff.

        I also thought about staff that they employ at work but I didn’t know how to express that concept with just one adjective. I had thought of the word “servile” but it’s not exactly what I mean. Sorry. Lexical poverty.

        Like

        Reply

  2. The problem is that Newsom’s is very hard to counter politically. No republican has the guts to say that yeah red states have higher murder rates but they’re overwhelmingly committed by blacks (see Mike Johnson’s tepid response). 13/50 is a well-known meme at this point but only online. Nobody’s including this stat in their campaign flyers lol.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

    1. You’re right. California has almost 40 million people and Louisiana has 4.6 million. California has more of everyone. The point people are making is about percentage of the population. CA is much lower than average and LA is much higher.

      Like

      Reply

      1. And the significant majority of crimes are committed in dense urban settings that have been run by…dems for decades. You can certainly make the case that living in cities contributes to crime but no one will make that argument because it messes with the practicality of sustainable development.

        Like

        Reply

        1. Some of the safest countries in the world are mostly urbanized. Most famously Singapore, but Japan and Australia are also extremely urbanized.

          Like

          Reply

    2. “more blacks in California than there are in Louisiana, you ignorant bigot”

      Blacks make up about 6% of the population of California and over 30% of the population of Louisiana.
      Wanna walk back those last three words or are you proud of you innumeracy?

      Liked by 2 people

      Reply

  4. Clarissa’s point was that California does not have a large black population. She was either lying or she is ignorant. Hard to say, because she is often ignorant, and she often lies.

    Like

    Reply

    1. “Clarissa’s point was that California does not have a large black population”

      The discussion is about percentages, not absolute numbers… did you have percentages in school or did the administration decide that it had been tainted by white supremacy?
      In what universe is 6% “large” as a percentage of the total population?

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply

      1. Well, in SA, white people are about 7% of the population. That’s why we always talk about white minority privilege.

        Like

        Reply

    2. A discussion of “a large population” is meaningless when we are talking about states of such varying sizes. We are discussing percentages, not total numbers. And it’s not me who made the clearly racist choice to compare California and Louisiana. It was Newsom. Which I pointed out. If somebody said “look how low violent crime numbers are in lily-white Whitesville, Illinois in comparison with East St Louis”, you’ll know exactly what was behind this statement. You are only pretending not to know because the statement came from Newsom.

      Liked by 2 people

      Reply

      1. Newsom is making a successful play for actual white supremacists, and it didn’t start today. They’ll vote for him yet, I promise, while you liberal doofuses sit there, flapping your ears.

        Like

        Reply

        1. I disagree. When he says red state crime, the image that comes to mind to his base is not blacks, it’s the caricature of the bible-thumping, gun-toting, bubba. He’s assuaging his base during the largest assault on their collective psyche in decades (trump election and its consequences). All they need is some flimsy evidence to maintain the illusion that white men are more dangerous than blacks and he’s giving it to them.

          Do you really think the median voter will look at what newsom posted and go on a autistic, Steve Sailer-esque journey to figure out the real cause of red state crime? No way. That person would’ve already converted to trump a long time ago.

          Like

          Reply

  5. read the fucking post, you moron. it was about absolute numbers, not percentages. ‘Tiny population’ not tiny percentage.

    Like

    Reply

    1. “read the fucking post, you moron”

      Well that sounds like a reasonable request.

      So, I read it.

      Now… there is such a thing as background information which helps create the foundation of common knowledge that makes things like presuppositions (crucial to human communication) possible.

      The US states vary wildly in total population and so when people talk about or compare the make up of the population of different states they implicitly (unless they clearly say otherwise) are talking about proportions. A similar logic applies to different countries. This is because absolute numbers often don’t tell you very much.

      I, and assuredly most other readers, immediately assumed that Clarissa was writing about percentages and not absolute numbers. You seem to be the outlier.

      Is that helpful?

      Like

      Reply

      1. Anonymous, whenever you want to say “moron” or “retard”, just replace it with “a person I feel sincere compassion for”.

        Like

        Reply

    3. Homicide rates are about percentages, not absolute numbers. California has a homicide rate of about 5 per 100,000. Louisiana, about 19 per 100,000 people. The population of California is the highest in the US, so there are going to be a lot of black people there too, but overall it’s 6% of the total, vs. 12 or 13 in the rest of the US (on average).

      Like

      Reply

  6. Mussolini made the trains run on time.

    There does seem to be a resurgence in popularity of Hitler. The left never had a problem with Stalin’s atrocities. Now that Israel seems to be pursuing their own final solution to the Palestine problem, I guess there is less to object to about Hitler.

    Like

    Reply

  7. I still don’t understand why Anonymous needs to use foul language when he or she wants to make his point.

    This is s civilised place of discussion where people come to debate ideas. At least, that’s what I think and the reason why I keep coming here. Am I wrong? Or deluded?

    Like

    Reply

    1. “why Anonymous needs to use foul language when he or she wants to make his point”

      People use what they have… I’m not totally against foul language and have quite the flair for it on the not so common situations when it’s called for. Using foul language as go to communication strategy degrades the user.

      Like

      Reply

  9. Only the tiniest bit OT: American “Palestinian” activist takes American Black activists to Palestine…. hilarity ensues (as does massive bvtthurt by the “Palestinian” at not being recognized as the most oppressed people….. ever!!!!!!!

    (she’s Palestinian like I’m Irish… her accent and body language are 1000% American Karen and I’m sure she’s had lots of talks with lots of managers)

    https://x.com/realMaalouf/status/1948038531563037045

    Like

    Reply

    1. She’s so dishonest about just about everything.

      And she’s as much Palestinian as third-generation Americans in New Jersey calling themselves Italian.

      What is it with this mythologizing of ethnic origins by native-born Americans? Can someone explain it to me because I genuinely do not understand it except as a social fad or maybe as some kind of inherited feeling of shame vis-à-vis Americans of British ancestry.

      Like

      Reply

      1. “What is it with this mythologizing of ethnic origins by native-born Americans?”

        Well… if you know the 9-nations model of North America (Joel Garreau) it seems to come almost entirely from the Foundry.

        It probably dates from large scale immigration from Europe (esp southern and eastern) to the then thriving industrial belt in the late 19th early 20th centuries and was probably a form of informal unions (banding together with those similar to you as a hedge against living in an unfamiliar environment). It’s an unavoidable side-effect of ‘large scale immigration or ‘diversity’ politics.

        It really wasn’t a thing in most of the country until the rust belt became a thing and people began moving away (taking their ethnic politics with them).

        Where I grew up (small town cracker Florida) no one ever thought about names as carriers of ethnic identity. Looking at old classmate names now I see lots of ‘ethnic’ names (Irish, Portuguese, Czech…). But it wasn’t until lots of people from the Foundry moved into the area that a local Italian-American club appeared.

        A secondary phenomenon would be a town commercializing an immigration past long after immigrants stopped arriving in numbers. Tarpon Springs in Florida (Greek) or New Braunfels, Texas (German).

        Finally, I’ll add that part of the psychological cost of immigration is realizing at some level that your ancestors didn’t have anything to do with making the new country an attractive place to live in… so the old country is romanticized and/or history is rewritten for the psychological comfort of those with an ‘immigration background’.

        Like

        Reply

Leave a reply to PaulS Cancel reply