Any flag by definition divides. That’s the whole purpose of a flag’s existence. A flag is a symbol of “us” that excludes the “not us.”

If you want a nation (as Starmer’s first sentence seems to indicate), then the very first thing you need to do is divide those who belong from those who don’t. If the entire planet is Britain, then nothing is.

Where was Starmer educated? This empty, lisping prattle is unworthy of a grown man.

8 responses to “A Flag That Divides”

  1. Avi Avatar
    Avi

    Random lady pensioner bring interviewed in the street:

    • “What are your thoughts on the Prime Minister?”
    • “His a*s must be jealous of his mouth with the amount of sh*t that comes out of it.”

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Clarissa Avatar

      “How are things in England?”
      “Oh, I can’t complain.”
      “Good! I’m glad to hear it.”
      “No, I mean I can’t complain or I’ll get arrested.”

      Liked by 1 person

  2. oldcowboy3 Avatar
    oldcowboy3

    LOL, the wuss will probably seek recompense for “emotional cruelty” or the like ;-D

    Like

    1. Clarissa Avatar

      At this point, he’s just got to be pranking us. This can’t possibly be done for any purpose that isn’t mockery.

      Like

      1. Stringer Bell Avatar
        Stringer Bell

        For sure. It’s done to completely demoralize the native population.

        Like

    2. oldcowboy3 Avatar
      oldcowboy3

      Okay, enough is enough:

      Liked by 1 person

  3. PaulS Avatar
    PaulS

    Nations are for wimps. A proper imperialist would want to make the entire planet British.

    https://sahistory.org.za/people/cecil-john-rhodes

    Like

Leave a comment