Sign up for a free recipe e-book →

Clarissa's Blog

Three Strikes

Published by

Clarissa

on

A four-year-old child was allegedly raped and given an STD by a man who is a career criminal. . . “Mr. Jelks, we have arrested six times over the past six years,” Baton Rouge Police Chief TJ Morse said. “He has everything from firearm charges to domestic violence battery, violation of protective orders, and is currently on probation.”. . .

In June 2024, he was arrested for Illegal possession of a stolen firearm, possession of a firearm or carrying of a concealed weapon by a person convicted of certain felonies, resisting an officer, and battery of a dating partner. For those charges, his bond was set at $15,000, and a probation hold was put into place. . . He was released on parole on June 26, 2025.

On August 1, weeks after his latest release, investigators said he raped a four-year-old and gave her Chlamydia.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wafb.com/2025/09/05/i-team-suspect-accused-raping-4-year-old-was-released-prison-weeks-ago/

Something is extremely wrong with our criminal justice system. Career criminals get caught and almost immediately released, so they proceed to commit even worse crimes.

We need a federal 3-strikes law, like they used to have in California. Most violent crime is recidivist. After the third felony, criminals should automatically get a life sentence. We will avoid a gigantic number of violent crimes if this simple and well-tested practice is adopted. There’s no reason not to do it. You can find an extraordinary number of these crimes where the perpetrator was just released on bond, probation, or even without any limitations at all.

7 responses to “Three Strikes”

  1. Avatar
    Anonymous

    The problem with a life sentence is the tax payer is forced to pay for these sub human animals. The second problem with life sentences is it gives the bleeding hearts plenty of time to find a way to get them out of prison and back into society so they can continue their wickedness.

    No we need to bring back the old methods. For murder, rape, arson, major theft, or treason, you were hung. For more minor crimes you were sent to do hard labor for a year or two.

    Either way the taxpayer is not on the hook for these animals. Those who aren’t hung pay for their own stay via the hard labor.

    Now all that being said, yea the justice system is horribly out of balance. I have over the last five years felt that there should be some sort of reciprocal justice. Where if we aren’t going to use the old methods, then after the second or third time in jail, if they commit things again the judge who reduced the sentence or those who left him out early go to jail for the full sentence along side him.

    To show how this would work, here are two examples.

    Say Mister K had been to jail twice, once for robbery, once for assault, and now was sentence a third time for killing someone. Lets say Mister Judge decided instead of the max sentence he put Mister K in for a reduced two year sentence. In this case when Mister K gets out, if he kills, robs, or assaults someone he goes back for the full sentence of his crime, and Mr. Judge in addition of being stripped of his ability to practice law is tossed in prison for the same amount of time, with neither of them being allowed access to a possible early release.

    Similarly lets say Mr. Judge had sentenced Mister. K for the full stay, but the oversight committee (I don’t recall what they are called.) Decided to let Mister K out early for “good behavior.” Lets say he then goes on to kill, rob, or assault someone. In this case Mister K would go back for the full sentence of his crime. Mister Judge would be fine, but the members of the oversight committee would be stripped of their positions in Law or Judiciary or office depending, and serve time along side Mister K with again with non of them being allowed access to early release.

    There should be consequences, and these activist traitorous judges are being allowed to get away scott free. So yea something needs to be done.

    • – W

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
    1. Clarissa Avatar
      Clarissa

      The judge who released Iryna’s murderer apparently never even passed the bar. And she has a financial stake in a mental facility to which she seems to have been channeling criminals she refused to jail. There should definitely be an investigation of all such cases. And everybody who allowed an utterly unqualified person like this judge to serve in that role should be charged. None of this is OK. It’s embarrassing to have this type of person serve as a judge.

      Liked by 3 people

      Reply
      1. Stringer Bell Avatar
        Stringer Bell

        And everybody who allowed an utterly unqualified person like this judge to serve in that role should be charged.

        I’m actually concerned about the future of the jury system. It is not inconceivable that you’ll soon have black juries refusing to convict obvious crimes purely out of racial animosity. Think OJ, but 100x worse, given the amount of poisonous rhetoric that’s been pumped into them by the regime. All it takes is one person in the jury to refuse to convict and it’s game over.

        Like

        Reply
        1. Avatar
          Anonymous

          If you think white flight was bad before…

          Like

          Reply
  2. Stringer Bell Avatar
    Stringer Bell

    Like

    Reply
  3. ed Avatar
    ed

    It’s a well known fact that a very small percentage of the population commits a very large percentage of the crime. If we target those people, crime goes down a lot.

    I still don’t fully understand why the three strike system was done away with. It makes all the sense in the world for violent felonies and keep these animals out of society.

    Like

    Reply
    1. Stringer Bell Avatar
      Stringer Bell

      If we target those people

      Nothing about this is an accident, it’s a deliberate political choice. Our overlords (politicians, district attorneys, and their NGO allies) have decided that this is how we must live. And if you object, you’re to be cast out of polite society. And remember, you (implicitly) and the party you belong to (explicitly) support this. Anarchy for the lumpen proles, tyranny for the law-abiding.

      What happened was POC activists over the last few decades came up with the narrative that our prisons were full of non-violent blacks who were convicted of petty crimes like smoking weed or jaywalking (The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness, Michelle Alexander). Then libtard criminologists actually looked at the data and were like this is not actually true, the prisons are actually filled with violent offenders so if you want to do *real* criminal justice reform you have to let them go. And here we are.

      Like

      Reply

Leave a comment

A conservative literary critic and college professor

Recent posts