Early Impotence

~ Clarissa

I’m reading the novel Contra natura by the Spanish writer Álvaro Pombo. It’s his magnum opus about homosexuality. The novel is good (although not an easy read for a hetero woman) and it made me think of current events.

All of this transgender furries stuff is supposed to be the purview of men who are too old to get aroused without increasingly exotic forms of stimulation. For 22-year-old men, it really shouldn’t be that hard to get aroused. It should be the most natural thing in the world. It’s later on, with age, when people can no longer get there without additional effort that some (obviously, not everybody) start exploring fetishes and all that stuff.

In any documentary about the kink circles filmed 20 years ago or earlier, you’d see that everybody is well-worn. These are people who wore out their bodies and can’t get them to function without additional effort. The only fresh-faced 20-year-olds there would be prostitutes.

Something went really wrong on a purely physical level for such very young men to need so much additional stimulation to get going. Without years of hard drugs, even 50 is way too young. In Pombo’s gay novel, it’s the 65-year-old character who has this problem while 25-year-old guys can’t even comprehend what he’s doing and why.

I’m not saying that every 65-year-old will have a severe problem like this. A certain kind of lifestyle tends to lead in this direction. But there’s definitely no reason for 20-year-old guys to be furries. Impotence did not used to be a young man’s problem.

Unknown's avatar

Published by Clarissa

22 thoughts on “Early Impotence”

    1. Definitely research is needed. Such young guys. Maybe medications of some sort. Many antidepressants destroy libido.

      All of a sudden, the face of a person with a collection of boutique kinks is not a tired 50yo but a very young 20yo.

      Unless there was an older man involved who was paying these boys to prance around in furry getup.

      Like

      Reply

      2. SSRIs very definitely destroy *performance*, and while some people find they get better after stopping the drugs, for others it is permanent. Don’t know about libido, for men. I do know it suppresses libido for many women who take them.

        When you hear people making the “but they’ll kill themselves if we don’t do *something*” argument about cross-gender hormone treatment, you have to understand that that was already a tried-and-true justification for putting everybody on SSRIs, well before trans was a thing. They had a lot of practice at it. Like, let’s not even talk about side effects, long-term damage, or permanently altering sexual function, because it won’t matter if they kill themselves first. IMO this is how we ended up where we are today: that argument worked SO well to shut down any kind of parental inquiry into side effects, that they used it again and again and now they can get kids on any kind of dangerous drugs they want. Just use the magic words “he’ll kill himself if we don’t”.

        Liked by 1 person

        Reply

  2. Something to add to the research. Near the end of Wiemar Germany, is where most of the modern abominations got their start from. All the stuff we see today spread from a “research” institute in or near Berlin. The owner and director wasn’t the first by any means, but everything we see in the modern world about this nonsense flows through his so called research seeing as he was the one to codify it, and write it into textbooks.

    No idea how old he was at the time, but he and his allies were putting his research into the schools of Germany very much like what happened in the last few decades all over the West. It was this that kicked off the Book burnings of the 1920s or early 1930s. The students refused to have that filth in the schools any longer, when it wasn’t withdraw as demanded by the students, they gathered it into piles and burned it.

    I don’t remember his name, but I do recalled that called himself a doctor, although he was certainly nothing of the sort. As far as I can remember he also pioneered the field of genital mutilation and attempting to change the gender of boys to girls via surgery. From what I recall, the boys and they were very young boys he did this too committed suicide later once they grew up enough to realize and understand what the lunatic had done to and stolen from them.

    But going back to the original article, I don’t know how old this guy was, but the thing is, this is not a physical issue, this is a spiritual issue.

    The devil is real, fallen angels are real, the giants that were killed by the flood we are told by God that because they were missing something (I can’t recall if they had no spirit or if they had no soul.) That when they died, their souls or spirits could not find rest, which means they are forever wandering, looking for vessels to inhabit. (These would be the demons that possess people if anyone is interested.)

    I think, that most of the people pushing this agenda are demon possessed, I find it extremely convincing that someone who takes up this particular banner hates. Not just ignores, but actively hates Christianity, Jesus, and God with every ounce of their being. Yet they have no issue with Islam, or Buddha, or any of the false gods made of wood, stones, and lies.

    I honestly feel pity for them. Oh I have no objection to driving them out (exile) or removing them if need be via bullet or a rope in order to defend my family, my nation, or my people. But I do feel pity for them. They are possessed by something that hates them as much as it hates me and my God. It will keep them blinded in order to damn them to hell, and actively attempts to drag as many souls into the fires with it as possible.

    This is a spiritual war, not a physical one although I can certainly understand why people who do not know or believe in Jesus could certainly mistake it as being a physical war.

    • – W

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

    1. W, I’ve also often thought about Germany in the 1920’s and 1939’s, transsexualism, and how that seems to trigger an extreme reaction in society.

      Like

      Reply

      2. “my youth in early 2000s”

        I first heard of furries in the mid-late 1990s (early internet) thanks to the late? lamented? site “portal of evil” which collected links to a variety of fringe/bizarre groups and/or crazy people. What I remembered was mostly they seemed to be in their 20s (and up).

        Like

        Reply

  4. A comedy podcast I used to listen to had its target demographic men in the late 20s to early 30s and one of the main sponsors of the podcast was a boner pill. Apparently it’s a thing.

    Worth noting that most young people these days are on some kind of SSRIs or other depression meds, which also have the side effect of killing boners.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

  5. There are apparently a lot of young men who are impotent with a partner and the reason is porn (and masturbation with a death grip that no human orifice can replicate). Porn today isn’t what it used to be 30 years ago. It’s easily accessible, with endless variety, and comes in increasingly violent flavors. Men get desensitized (both physically and psychologically) and require more and more exotic forms of stimulation.

    Liked by 2 people

    Reply

  6. “For 22-year-old men, it really shouldn’t be that hard to get aroused”

    I think kinks come in two flavors… lots of them seem to have roots in childhood/adolescence but mostly are thought about it in youth but only really acted on much later (or they get lost along the way).

    Then there are the ‘looking for arousal’ late acquired kinks (I think a lot of swingers, bondage types and a fair amount of AGPs are that).

    That a 22-year-old had kinky thoughts isn’t shocking, that he was acting on them as the primary expression of his intimate-emotional life is…. that he would use them as a pretext for murder is even more shocking…

    Liked by 2 people

    Reply

    1. These boys had a whole lifestyle created around this. It’s wasn’t a fantasy but a very hardened (no pun intended) way of being. I don’t understand how one can get there in only 4 years of adulthood. The years that are usually occupied by trying to make ends meet, working crappy jobs while going through school, trying to run your own household for the first time.

      “Tried out of curiosity” is one thing. This is “created a whole life around it in just a few years.”.

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply

      1. “I don’t understand how one can get there in only 4 years of adulthood”

        Very weird…. FWIW, some gays on gender critical twitter said the first pictures/film of Robinson set off their gaydar. Now I’m thinking about a new theory…. it’s an old cliche that sometimes in the past (don’t know if it’s still a thing) men sometimes claimed to be bisexual because they weren’t ready to be publicly gay. Now I’m wondering if the GAMP thing is something similar… a transitional… label that got stuck (as it were) given the ability of the internet to maximize kinks and rationalize them as lifestyles…

        Now I’m also wondering if that was the source of the break that had him drop out of college….

        Liked by 1 person

        Reply

        1. We would all be so much happier if these guys could simply live as gay men. We were told insistently that all that was needed was to legitimize gayness, both socially and legally. So we legitimized. But somehow the result is the exact opposite.

          Liked by 3 people

          Reply

Leave a reply to cliff arroyo Cancel reply