Everyone Seen

Again, I have to ask, is Starmer mocking the Brits? “Everyone seen”, he’ll say exactly at the time when Britons are protesting against his plan to introduce a massive new surveillance regime.

Also, a new country? What if people like their actual country? Is it OK to like your country, or is it necessary always to try and create a new version?

10 thoughts on “Everyone Seen

  1. That is the problem with trying to understand weak males, does Starmer actually imagine that somehow the people want a “new country”?

    Sometimes you have to leave it up to karma. because otherwise you are bloody well going to jail ;-D

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Dystopian is not enough to describe the UK today.

    And Sir Keir Starmer is not just weak and ineffective. He’s deluded and pathetic.

    Like

    1. I actually think Starmer is anything but weak and ineffective. I think he hides behind the bumbling, soft persona. But look at what he’s achieving. He’ll turn the UK into the first ever surveillance paradise that’s the biggest neoliberal dream.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. You may be on to something, Clarissa, but I’ve followed Starmer’s career from the days when he was an up-and-coming human rights lawyer, who inexplicably, was always involved in the most precedent-setting cases.

        He clearly is NOT a person of intellectually high calibre, therefore there must be another explanation. I reckon he is a puppet figure whose strings someone who is much higher up and intellectually formidable is moving.

        Like

        1. From what I have heard from British political news pod-casters. Mainly because the BBC is nothing but propaganda and can’t be trusted to tell the truth. The previous conservative government under Prime Minister Blair were trying to push digital ids. When Labor won the election it was on a push to not allow this. Then Starmer pushed this last weekend without any warning, votes, and completely against his own party, much less everyone else’s political parties.

          So yea he is almost certainly a puppet on someone else’s strings. Likely that Blair fellow too for that matter.

          I would also like to point out that laws, bills, and pushes for this and that in government take time as in years to come about. It is notoriously slow moving. So I would like to remind everyone in the space of about 2 months, nearly every Western nation in the world, plus a good chunk of the rest, passed massive surveillance laws, censorship laws, digital id laws, etc. All at the same time. There was nothing organic about this. This is a puppet-master making his puppets dance.

          • – W

          Like

          1. I would further like to remind everyone once more that.

            A) There is a globalists new world order. The so called conspiracy theorists were correct.

            B) There have been major pushes to erode and destroy the nation states.

            C) There has been a massive push to depopulate the planet. Once more the so called conspiracy theorists were correct.

            D) There has been a massive push to replace the white populations. Even the mainstream media is grudgingly accepting this. Once again the so called conspiracy theorists were correct.

            E) The Beast system spoken of in Revelation some 2,000 years ago states that in the last days you will be unable to buy or sell without the mark. Now while the Digital ID is not the mark, we grow ever closer to the day where without sometime of that nature you will be unable to buy or sell. As most major banks and the majority of governments in the world have recently as of the last 5 years stated they were attempting to remove physical currency and move to a digital based currency.

            The standing joke is this. What is a conspiracy theory? Its the truth about six months before it becomes know as the truth.

            • – W

            Like

            • – W

            I always read your comments with interest but I think your wires got crossed this time. Blair is a Labour politician who led the first Labour government in 1997 for two terms until 2007, after 18 years of Conservative governments (under Prime Ministers Thatcher and Major).

            Blair is the “grey eminence” who masterminded the idea of the UK opening the floodgates of immigration, who supported the appointment of hundreds and hundreds of judges steeped in Left-wing ideology and/or human rights jurisprudence so wide-ranging that the current minister of justice has openly said quite recently – only a couple of weeks ago – that the rights of foreign immigrants and asylum-seekers trump those of native UK citizens.

            National ID, whether digital or not, has been the dream ticket of any authoritarian government, no matter what colour they are under. So, check your sources again.

            Liked by 2 people

            1. It is entirely possible I was wrong on this one. Despite my interest in current British politics. Which is very much like watching a train-wreck taking place. I am not that informed about politics in Britain prior to this current government.

              The British political pod-casters I was listening to had stated that Blair was a conservative and had tried to push id laws which was why labor had won the last round. I took their word for it seeing as it was their country and the stuff they were talking about with the current government had been entirely accurate thus far.

              So again it is entirely possible I am wrong on this one.

              • – W

              Like

  3. On a separate note, just look at this incompetence.

    This is legit hilarious: according to the US Secretary of Agriculture herself, Trump’s bailout of Argentina means that US taxpayers are now effectively subsidizing Argentinian soybean exports to China – the very market American farmers have been shut out of.

    All the funnier when you consider that one of the key objectives of the bailout is presumably to prevent Argentina – one of the US’s only friendly governments left in South America – from moving closer to China. And instead it’s effectively funding the exact opposite outcome.

    This is according to this leaked textthat Scott Bessent is reading from Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins (src: https://dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15145835/Scott-Bessent-leaks-sensitive-text-message-sounding-alarm-China.html), which says:

    “I’m getting more intel, but this is highly unfortunate. We bailed out Argentina yesterday (Bessent) and in return, the Argentine’s removed their export tariffs on grains, reducing their price, and sold a bunch of soybeans to China, at a time when we would normally be selling to China. Soy prices dropping further because of it. This gives China more leverage on us.”

    Like

    1. Incompetence is exactly right. Look at the libs. They are deadly effective. They know exactly what they want and go for it with the determination and the effectiveness of a nuclear missile. While on our side, there’s endless bumbling and fumbling.

      Like

Leave a reply to Anonymous Cancel reply