I’m sorry, is it me having a hallucination or have we heard this before?
I’d be very happy to be told it’s a hallucination.
Broken Record
Opinions, art, debate
Opinions, art, debate
I’m sorry, is it me having a hallucination or have we heard this before?
I’d be very happy to be told it’s a hallucination.
Clarissa's Blog 
I think iran’s nuclear bomb is mentioned in the torah.
LikeLike
Probably alongside the global warming which is also about to happen any day now since Noah’s Ark.
LikeLike
Iran having a nuclear bomb would literally be the most stabilizing move for the region. It’ll stop israel from chimping out 24/7.
LikeLike
I have zero interest in that region. I care about our region. What happens if Iran decides to drop it on American infidels?
LikeLike
It’ll be a dream come true for israelis. Dead goyim AND the outcome being a proper war against iran? That’s a 2-for-1 special!
LikeLike
What about us, though? I’m much more interested in us.
I’m not getting any answer to this question.
LikeLike
We agree! This does nothing for us and everything for israel.
LikeLike
My question is, what if Iran does decide to nuke the American infidels in America?
LikeLike
Is this a joke? This is a country that did not retaliate when literal chemical and biological weapons were used on it by iraq in the iran-iraq war (supplied by us, btw).
The only country that is insane enough to do shit like this is israel if it doesn’t get its way.
LikeLike
Everything happens for the first time after a long time of not happening. This is not an argument.
I also don’t want a war with Iran. But it’s inevitable because the opposing side doesn’t have an argument.
LikeLike
Same reason Russia or China don’t.
Iran getting a nuke is not an existential threat to us anymore than it was when Soviets and China got one.
LikeLike
Russia and China are not religious fanatics. There was zero threat from the Soviets. But Islamic suicide bombers? I need a serious argument that they wouldn’t.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Israel is more of a religiously fanatic country than Iran. Genocidal subhumans.
LikeLike
This is hard to believe.
LikeLike
It’s inevitable because your president is a slave to jews. lol at the idea that the default position of a country is to be attacked and invaded, unless it can provide a satisfactory response to the attacking country (which the attacking country will never accept anyway). Jewlogic 101.
LikeLike
As I said, there is no argument. 🙂
LikeLike
“Provide me with a convincing argument as to why I should not kill you” is the logic of sociopaths.
LikeLike
And if it’s to prevent a much bigger killing? We are talking nuclear. This is very serious.
LikeLike
Your fantasies are your own.
LikeLike
That will be proven true if there is no strike. I hope there is no strike but not for the reasons you name.
LikeLike
LOL, as I was saying. Talk about ZOG, Jesus Christ.
LikeLike
Neither Israel nor the United States is going to let Iran succeed in developing a nuclear bomb. Why do you think Trump is rapidly moving military firepower into the waters around Iran?
Dreidel
LikeLike
You’re not a serious person when it comes to this topic, I’m sorry to say. Just spouting random shit, desperately hoping something sticks. This is Laura Loomer level of garbage.
LikeLike
My two cent.
I am not happy about this turn of direction. I wasn’t pleased when Trump bombed the nuclear reactors on the behalf of Israel last year. Though I was happy that we didn’t wind up in a shooting war. I am even less happy with this repeated idiocy.
I don’t know why Trump and Vance are accepting Israel telling them Iran has nukes. Quite frankly at this point I don’t actually care if Iran does or not.
I don’t like the idea of attacking someone unless they have struck first. Which is why I am perfectly fine with the US invading Mexico. Those cartels have killed tens of thousands of Americans. Wiping them from the face of existence is justified.
Iran on the other hand while somewhere I don’t want to visit, and certainly don’t want to let people immigrate into my country from. Is not our problem. Frankly we should never have been involved in the middle east from the start.
If Israel decides to stir up hatred in the surrounding countries, so be it. Not a single drop of American blood should be spilled for this lunacy. Not a single penny should be spent over there causing trouble that will follow us home.
If Iran has a nuke. There are two massively over-funded intelligence groups who are filled to the brink with sociopaths who would normally be locked in jail. They should have no issue killing everyone on the sites and destroying them.
Ignoring that. Both Israel and the US have defensive systems built specifically to shoot nukes out of the sky.
Ignoring that. If they do have a nuke, then it is under observation. Moving it to a launch site, and preparing to fire it is not a quick five minute operation. Hell putting a nuclear warhead into a missile for a fighter. Again something that is watched, and that there are defenses for.
Lastly if said nuke “somehow” mysteriously manages to make it past both over funded intelligence agencies. Past the massive spending on military defenses. And somehow manages to destroy a city. Then yes Iran should be removed from the map. Immediately after that event both intelligence agencies, the presidents of the US and Israel, and the heads of both militaries should be removed as well.
But until that happens, we should not be meddling. We should not be allowing Israel to use us as a sled-hammer in their goals of conquest. We should not be making more enemies by attacking countries we are not at war with.
This is not that hard to understand. Hell this is what we teach our kids. Don’t attack someone unless they strike you first. And don’t cry wolf, because then if its true, no one will believe you. And frankly I don’t believe Mr. “Iran is weeks away from a nuke” since 1992 Netanyahu.
LikeLike
Thank you, I appreciate this argument.
The reason why I oppose any strikes on Iran is as follows. There can be only two reasons to strike Iran: preventative and regime change.
I’m against preventative strikes because we are unable to carry them out successfully. As evidenced by the fact that we failed to carry them out successfully in the summer. One of my favorite aphorisms is, “where you are capable of nothing, you should want nothing.” Or, in cruder terms, release the excrement or get off the toilet bowl.
As for regime change, I’m opposed because there’s nothing to change to. Any subsequent Iran government will hate us. So what’s the point of causing death and destruction to arrive at the exact same result?
There’s an additional reason why I’m opposed which is that I didn’t vote for this. I voted for a very clear promise to concentrate on domestic issues. I’m not seeing that. Instead, I’m seeing a whole lot of foreign policy with no appreciable results besides Venezuela. I believe it’s urgently necessary to move off foreign policy for a while. Can we have at least 6 months of America First? I strongly believe that most of the R voters would support that.
LikeLike