On the most recent Tucker Carlson show, the guest advanced the idea that the main problem of religion in America is that churches don’t have enough government oversight of their finances. Tucker eagerly embraced this idea.
Can the people who keep insisting that Tucker is not liberal explain which branch of conservatism supports more government interference in religion? Not only would we need to throw away the US Constitution to introduce this government oversight over the affairs of churches, we’d open an era of future liberal governments punishing the faithful over the aspects of their religious teachings that contradict progressivist dogma. If you think this is in any way conservative, you must be on drugs.
The reason why government should control church finances, this guest claims, is that churches are corrupt. So our famously non-corrupt government should take over. We’ve truly arrived at the heights of conservative thinking with this kind of reasoning.

