Multiculturalism According to Bauman

“Multiculturalism,” Zygmunt Bauman writes in his recent book Culture in a Liquid Modern World, “acts as a socially conservative force. Its achievement is the transformation of social inequality, a phenomenon highly unlikely to win general approval, into the guise of ‘cultural diversity’, that is to say, a phenomenon deserving of universal respect and careful cultivation.”

I always found it fascinating how people convince themselves that the profund dismissiveness and contempt towards other cultures that multiculturalism conceals are somehow progressive. In reality, the result of multi-culturalism is always hatred, animosity, barbarity, and suffering for everybody involved. Except the politicians who advance this concept, of course.

16 thoughts on “Multiculturalism According to Bauman

  1. This is moral hair shirt “progessivism”. It’s a very strong narrative in Western culture, that the more we punish ourselves, the more we are improving. Actually, as Nietzsche showed those progressives would have their psychology back to front — rather, the more we punish ourselves, the more we morally criticize and condemn. If we were to stop hurting ourselves and enjoy ourselves a bit more, we would certainly become more tolerant of others too, and allow them more scope to be themselves.

    Like

    1. It’s a supermarket mentality, too. People automatically think that having a million brands is good even though they always buy the same brand. In the same way, having a crowd of people who have nothing in common all bunched up together is considered to be good just because these people are like different consumer goods.

      Like

    2. We don’t have to punish ourselves, but we should stop to policing the world and we should stop to commit massive murder and terrorism to “strangers” (sic) in their own land.

      Like

  2. To steal an argument that I agree with, long term multiculturalism with no common assimilatory pressure works best when the boundaries between social groups are comparatively impermeable. This makes it difficult or impossible to marry across social groups (whether based on class, religion or language) and it means individuals do not have access to various economic/political/social opportunities unless their ancestors in their particular group did. A government with no interest in educating the population or concern about how they might vote (‘cuz there’s no elections) is also a plus.

    Granted that’s pretty much what your excerpt said but repeating the same thing in different ways helps the message to sink in.

    Like

    1. Bauman lives in Europe and he has already seen the result of stupidly and blindly implementing multiculturalist policies based on the idea that any difference is good just because it exists. Now we are seeing universities such as mine, which are struggling with funding as it is, hire people for very highly paid positions of “Dean of Diversity.” What that person will be doing all day long is a mystery I don’t want to solve.

      Like

  3. Dean of diversity will help keep things under control. You want those diverse people to be advertising their native foods, not demanding actual equality or global perspectives in class or anything like that.

    Multiculturalism is a technology to keep people from discussing real issues…

    Like

    1. Exactly!!! Alongside the hiring of the Dean of Diversity, there is constant talk of cutting the French program. And the Study Abroad in France has virtually been destroyed. And what would foster greater cultural understanding and curiosity, the Dean or the Study Abroad? The answer is obvious.

      Like

  4. So we should embrace the Native American cultures because multiculturalism is always bad?

    What’s multiculturalism, really? If you talk about Trudeauist anti-Québec multiculturalism (which is not interested at all by the First Nations cultures), I tend to be agreeing with you, but I don’t think we should enforce how others should live.

    Like

    1. The wa multicultiralism is practiced today is more like indifference hiding under the empty celebration of otherness. Bauman proposes, instead, a dialogue where everybody deserves the right to be heard but nobody’s difference is accepted just because it exists.

      You will be happy to know that in this book Bauman is very supportive of Quebec’s language policies. 🙂

      Like

      1. “You will be happy to know that in this book Bauman is very supportive of Quebec’s language policies. ”

        Good, but I don’t like the “ads section” of the Bill 101, though.

        Like

      2. “Bauman proposes, instead, a dialogue where everybody deserves the right to be heard but nobody’s difference is accepted just because it exists. ”

        Other intellectuals distinguishes “interculturalism” and “multiculturalism”. Bauman’s proposal seems like interculturalism. No problem for me.

        Like

      3. As a confirmed xenophile, I very much like encountering people from other cultures. Nevertheless, some things, especially the ways that some cultures treat girls and women, deeply offend me. Others potentially create problems I do not know how to deal with. (For example, if a woman student keeps her face covered in one of my classes, how can I know who she is and whether she is, for example, sending someone else to take a test for her.)

        Like

Leave a comment