Scott Walker Didn’t Even Graduate From College

So Scott Walker never even graduated from college?

How very unsurprising that this clown was too stupid even to get a Bachelor’s degree.

Let’s now stop embarrassing ourselves with suggestions that somebody who is this useless can actually lead the country. Low-achieving losers are not what we need in the world where education is everything.

41 thoughts on “Scott Walker Didn’t Even Graduate From College

  1. How very unsurprising that this clown was too stupid even to get a Bachelor’s degree.
    That doesn’t function as proof of his stupidity. GWB graduated from an Ivy League school, and Jeb Bush graduated Phi Beta Kappa from his university in two years. And they are both very stupid.
    It might explain part of his hostility towards public educators, educated people and people who need and want an education.

    Like

    1. All poodles are dogs but not all dogs are poodles. Not everybody who graduates college is a genius but everybody who doesn’t manage to and keeps opining on higher education definitely is an idiot.

      Like

        1. It’s impossible to gauge which Republican candidate is worse. They are all so sucky. What a total degeneration of the party if that’s all they can choose from.

          Like

          1. I heard a show on NPR where they were pushing for, and praising Jeb Bush. Even suggesting people who normally vote Democratic ought to like him. Insane.

            Like

            1. Jeb Bush makes me want to vomit. Haven’t we had enough of the entire idiot family? Can they just go away already?

              People have such short memories that I keep thinking of Orwell’s 1984.

              Like

            2. “Even suggesting people who normally vote Democratic ought to like him. Insane.”

              So suggesting that people who vote Democratic OUGHT to like J. Bush or that people who vote Democratic DO like J. Bush? I hope it’s the former because the later option will give me nightmares until the elections. What were they saying we should like about him?

              Like

              1. They were alleging he was good on immigration and education. They were interviewing alleged Democrats who were saying they would not normally consider a Republican but Jeb Bush looked pretty good.

                Like

  2. I agree. I feel like a Bachelor’s degree should be a minimum requirement for president. This is why he’s so rabildy against education. It makes him feel inferior.

    Like

    1. “This is why he’s so rabidly against education. It makes him feel inferior.”

      • I knew there was something pathological here when he started attacking the mission statement of “searching for truth.” This was just bizarre. And his statements about teachers are very overwrought.

      Like

      1. The whole idea of a “search for truth” terrifies some people. That’s why a lot of places don’t even bother. We just teach sophistry and job prep. I’m sure Walker would be behind that; maybe he should run in Illinois.

        Like

  3. Wow… just insane talk.. disappointing.. I get this may be a love fest here for you but that really is complete bull shit clarissa. Sure a bachelors degree may indicate some intelligence.. but clearly its not the only thing that does.

    I don’t particularly like any of these three business titans: Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, and Steve Jobs, but all were/are legitimately extremely intelligent individuals.

    Again, to block your likely responses, clearly business and politics are separate, but obviously very smart people don’t go to college. Most very smart people do, but not all .

    Lastly, valedictorian of my class here, B+ lowest grade of my life, and 2 A- from 3rd grade thru college graduate at a top 50 school.

    I don’t know how you and everyone else will respond here, but you have become unhinged.. and it is appropriate that someone calls you on the insane elitism and complete foolishness of your comment. Just wow….

    Like

    1. I mean you teach at a mid-tier university at best.. one that is between number 150 and 200… so anyone teaching or graduating at yoru school clearly isn’t fit to be president either. I mean there are almost a million students each year who graduate from better schools..

      (see how ridiculous that is…)

      Like

    2. “Wow… just insane talk.. disappointing.. I get this may be a love fest here for you but that really is complete bull shit clarissa.”

      • Try to control the hysteria or take a pill. What’s with the unhinged outbursts?

      “Again, to block your likely responses”

      • Get yourself under control, formulate your comments in a civilized way, and then I might respond.

      Like

  4. Why do conservatives hate educated people so much? Twenty years ago when the Conservative Party in Ontario was in power, the conservative Premier of the province, Mike Harris, hated teachers so much that he put John Snobelen as Minister in charge of the Department of Education and Training. Snobelen was a Grade 11 drop out who was quoted as saying he wanted to bankrupt the educational system.

    “In 1997, Snobelen introduced Bill 160, which gave the province control of municipal education taxes, introduced standardized testing, cut teaching preparation time, allowed the government to determine class sizes and granted early retirement initiatives to older, more experienced teachers. Critics argue that the purpose of this bill was to cut education spending, and reduce the power of the teachers’ unions in order to privatize Ontario’s public education system (Klein, N., The Shock Doctrine). The education restructuring, along with other cuts to government spending, was expected to significantly reduce the province’s deficit. Community organizations, teachers and leaders of the provincial unions criticized the bill not only as an attack on local control of public schools and on union bargaining influence, but also as unnecessarily confrontational and as threatening the quality of Ontario’s education system.” (Wikipedia)

    And so today, Louisiana, Illinois, Wisconsin and Kansas are following the same path. Didn’t happen in Ontario. Will it happen now?

    Like

    1. “Why do conservatives hate educated people so much?”

      • I think it’s obvious. Educated, literate people see how inept and stupid they are and make fun of them. Only very dumb illiterates support them. Can you imagine anybody with a functioning brain supporting Scott Walker?

      “And so today, Louisiana, Illinois, Wisconsin and Kansas are following the same path. Didn’t happen in Ontario. Will it happen now?”

      • Depends on how stupid people are and how even more stupid they want to be.

      Like

  5. I know, right.

    In Pennsylvania, Blacks are barely cracking past the 2/3 margin on graduation rates. Ohio is even worse. Michigan is 60%! I imagine the college graduation rates are much, much lower.

    These idiots should not be voting. Sure, that may have meant Romney would have been president (and horror of horrors, we’d be enduring McCain’s second term!), but it’s insane that people who don’t have a high school level of education should have any say in how the country is run!

    Now I know, there’s a bit of a difference between a midwestern white guy dropping out of college and a poor urban black who never had the chance to go, but that misses two points:

    1) Just because your ignorance might be somewhat justified, doesn’t mean you ought to have a say in how the government interacts with me.

    2) Detroit and Philadelphia are controlled by the Democrat party, so they need to get their act together and get their voters educated. Not my fault in rural Georgia if people in Philly are keeping minorities down.

    Or… curiously, is this different? Is it okay for ignorant people to elect government officials presented to them, just not to run for the position themselves?

    Like

    1. “Or… curiously, is this different? Is it okay for ignorant people to elect government officials presented to them, just not to run for the position themselves?”

      • Obviously. It is also OK to go to a doctor while having zero knowledge of medicine while it’s not OK to practice medicine without a degree.

      Like

      1. Yes, But when an ignorant person goes to a doctor, they don’t get a say in what the doctor prescribes to me.

        With politics, ignorant people voting for X very much has an impact on me.

        Or rather, it’s one thing for the ignorant to go to a hospital when they’re sick, it’s another thing to allow them a vote on who makes up the board of directors.

        Like

        1. “Yes, But when an ignorant person goes to a doctor, they don’t get a say in what the doctor prescribes to me.”

          • Actually, yes, they do. One major example is how hard and expensive it is to get any assistance for mental health issues in this country that doesn’t involve pills. The almost complete destruction of any other healthcare options is precisely the result of stupid, lazy people demanding pills in massive numbers. And we all just accept that. I can give a gazillion more examples and so can you, once you get over this very strange need to defend a presidential bid by an ignoramus.

          “Or rather, it’s one thing for the ignorant to go to a hospital when they’re sick, it’s another thing to allow them a vote on who makes up the board of directors.”

          • Welcome to democracy and welcome to a free market. Shall we discuss Tocqueville now? 🙂 🙂

          Like

          1. Yes well: Scott Walker – welcome to Democracy!

            So we both agree that it is objectively harmful to allow ignorant people a say in national policy, be it politics and medicine. And we both agree that having Democracy means allowing Scott Walker to run for president. Have I got it right?

            I defend against the double standard, that that means defending Scott Walker is what it is. Once you accept a democratic system of government , and once you accept that you are opening the electorate to the masses, then you accept that you’ll have idiots in charge. But what you seem to want to do is say that the system itself is acceptable, but decry the expected outcome.

            I have yet to see a single article questioning what Mark Begich was doing serving in the Senate. Now granted, he never ran for president – but the argument is that these people shouldn’t even be in positions of power to consider running for president in the first place. Singling out Scott Walker looks less like a genuine concern for an educated president, and more like a partisan hit piece.

            Like

            1. “Once you accept a democratic system of government , and once you accept that you are opening the electorate to the masses, then you accept that you’ll have idiots in charge.”

              • So you do want to discuss Tocqueville, after all? 🙂

              “I have yet to see a single article questioning what Mark Begich was doing serving in the Senate.”

              • Never heard of the guy.

              “Singling out Scott Walker looks less like a genuine concern for an educated president, and more like a partisan hit piece.”

              • My opinion that an uneducated, illiterate president is a disgrace will remain exactly the same if a Democrat without a college degree tries to run for president.

              Like

              1. In your case, I believe that. I do not believe that to be the case for most people ‘concerned’ with Scott Walker’s lack of college credentials. And to be fair, you cannot possibly be held accountable for the lack of good faith I find in people who are not you!

                Like

    2. Consumers of a service need not have the same qualifications as providers of that service. So yes, curiously, electing and being elected are two entirely different things. ))))))))))))))))))))))))

      Like

      1. “Consumers of a service need not have the same qualifications as providers of that service.”

        • Exactly. It’s surprising that this has to be debated at such length. Today, even secretaries are not hired without a college degree. The world is rapidly changing. Like it or not, it just is. People without college degrees are simply not qualified to work in the modern office. Denying that is childish and ridiculous. And a politician who doesn’t even get this very simple idea will not be able to offer any meaningful leadership to the country.

        Like

  6. Of course, if you’re going to tax someone and mandate he be willing to serve as cannon fodder should the state demand it of him, you have to be ready to give a little too. I have no doubt that the French or Russian aristocrat was more classical educated than their respective peasants, but they were really quite stupid when it came down to maintaining their lot.

    Like

    1. I have no idea what you are trying to say. That, in the modern world, it makes sense to elect as president a low-achieving ne’er-do-well who has no education? For what purpose? To become the butt of every joke everywhere on the planet? Have we not had enough with the idiocy of Bush who couldn’t string two words together?

      There is nothing here to defend. People need to get educated to work in responsible positions. It isn’t such an onerous requirement to ask a person to read a couple of books before attempting to run an enormous country.

      Like

      1. Being the butt of every joke on the planet is meaningless. My welfare is not at all impacted by what people thousands of miles away think of me.

        But that wasn’t my point. My point was that a qualification of my original point that ignorant people shouldn’t be allowed to vote – that they nonetheless deserve something, because something is expected from them.

        I do not see how you can say it’s wrong for ignorant people to hold an office, but acceptable for ignorant people to determine who gets the office. As I said above, it’s not the same as someone without a medical degree going to the doctor, it’s the equivalent of someone without a medical degree deciding who gets a medical license.

        Like

        1. “Being the butt of every joke on the planet is meaningless. My welfare is not at all impacted by what people thousands of miles away think of me.”

          • It’s 2015. There is this little thing called globalization that’s been going on for a while. 🙂

          “I do not see how you can say it’s wrong for ignorant people to hold an office, but acceptable for ignorant people to determine who gets the office.”

          • I have already answered this question.

          “As I said above, it’s not the same as someone without a medical degree going to the doctor, it’s the equivalent of someone without a medical degree deciding who gets a medical license.”

          • Awarding licenses is a professional pursuit, so this is a false analogy. You can’t practice a profession without qualifications. But you can consume the services of a professional without having qualifications. Exercise of services does not equal consumption of said services. Let’s not argue about something so obvious.

          Like

          1. So what? ISIS is a bunch of murderous lunatics who everyone agrees are repulsive. That does not change the fact that they are capable of enforcing their will on lots of people and that does not look like it will be changing any time soon. Putin is any number of things… doesn’t make any difference to the people being shelled. Nobody’s going to stop buying ‘made in China’ anytime soon.

            International opinion is overrated.

            And don’t you often say that Americans think way to highly of their impact on other countries – that Putin will do what he wants regardless of who we have in the oval office? Whatever merits or problems a particular candidate may have, worrying about what jokes foreigners will tell each other about America is a meaningless thing to worry about.

            Voting isn’t ‘consuming the services’, it’s – in theory – having an active voice in policy making. And unlike the idiot who insists on pills and so creating a market that pushes pills, voting allows one to push policies on other people that they themselves are not subject to – at least the guy pushing for pills wants the bloody pills! Because whether it’s voting to tax someone else, or voting to bomb someone else, it’s a false analogy to compare voting to a buyer purchasing a product primarily for their own consumption – even if that has a ripple effect on the populace.

            Like

            1. “ISIS is a bunch of murderous lunatics who everyone agrees are repulsive. That does not change the fact that they are capable of enforcing their will on lots of people and that does not look like it will be changing any time soon.”

              • ISIS is extremely aware of globalization and is exploiting it brilliantly. I recommend Terror and Consent by the brilliant Philip Bobbitt. They has been predicting ISIS since last century. In order to fight ISIS, we need people in charge who are capable of understanding what it is and what it is doing.

              “And unlike the idiot who insists on pills and so creating a market that pushes pills, voting allows one to push policies on other people that they themselves are not subject to – at least the guy pushing for pills wants the bloody pills!”

              • This is a really insignificant distinction. What are we arguing about? That professionals don’t need to be qualified for positions of great responsibility? Why do you experience the need to argue that? What is the benefit of this idea to you personally?

              I can easily explain why I believe that professionals should be qualified for their jobs.

              Like

  7. Let’s be honest: nobody would be howling about Scott Walker’s lack of college degree if he wasn’t actively and blatantly shitting on public education at all levels while attempting to destroy the working conditions of the last good blue collar jobs.

    Like

    1. “Let’s be honest: nobody would be howling about Scott Walker’s lack of college degree if he wasn’t actively and blatantly shitting on public education at all levels while attempting to destroy the working conditions of the last good blue collar jobs.”

      • I absolutely would be. I’m not Lenin, so I don’t believe that “a cook can run a country.” Only somebody who has a very profound and sophisticated education can be allowed anywhere near such a responsible and crucial job. People today can’t even do a simple secretary’s job without a degree. And anything more complex than that – come on, let’s be serious here.

      Like

Leave a comment