Why Bloomberg?

I have no idea why we are supposed to be listening to Bloomberg. I’m afraid of turning on the convention because I don’t want to see his smug face. Such great speakers except for this one useless fellow.

18 thoughts on “Why Bloomberg?

  1. Why Bloomberg, indeed? He has much more in common with Trump than Hillary — both men are New York billionaires who change party affiliation as easily as they change their suits.

    I wonder who Hillary thinks might be persuaded to vote Democratic by his no-doubt savage Trump-bashing — perhaps wealthy white independents…?

    Like

    1. Yeah, I have no idea either. She’s pissing off a lot of people with this decision, and not just the bernie people.

      Like

    1. Yes. This was a strong day of speeches and Obama really brought it home. Really impressive. I will miss him.

      Like

  2. Bloomberg did best poking holes in Trump’s business acumen to speak to independents who leaned Republican. Otherwise, meh.

    Like

    1. I think Bloomberg played an important role in explaining why no “Independent” should vote for Trump.

      Like

      1. Agree with Shakti. I think he was put there as a foil to Trump, to remind people that Trump is a shitty businessman. That message could only be convincingly delivered by a self-made billionaire.

        Like

        1. Yes, and it did make an impression. I only just discovered that Bloomberg is 4 times richer than Trump even claims to be. It did make sense to put him on stage after all.

          Like

          1. I wish he had done more ‘I wipe my ass with Trump’s net worth’ content, haha. Trump would’ve had a stroke.

            Like

Leave a reply to Evelina Anville Cancel reply