Gayle Newland

There is obviously a case for fraud here but where is sexual assault? This is not only consensual sex but an actual romantic relationship of a long-term nature. That both of the willing participants are weirdos of the first order is hardly a crime. 

In the meanwhile, real rape and torture of minors goes unprosecuted. 


8 thoughts on “Gayle Newland”

  1. Wow, sounds like such an absurdist story that some twisted slight-touch-of-talent wannabe bizarro writer must have ground it out stoned on the cheapest weed available in their state.

    The “victim” in this situation always agreed to wear a blindfold in all circumstances, whenever she met with the “aggressor’? She was also so sexually inexperienced that she couldn’t tell an artificial device in her body from a real penis, and never wondered about the missing climax? Somehow she also never managed to recognize her feminine employee’s voice?

    The “aggressor” has been diagnosed by a psychiatrist as suffering from gender dysphoria, Asperger syndrome, eating disorders, anxiety, obsessive compulsive disorder, and depression. Did the shrink miss a few pages in the lastest DSM-5 manual?

    The financial fraud charges make sense, but as for the rest…well, maybe I’ll be able to come to some intelligent conclusion tomorrow, when it’s not far too late in the Arizona night for mind to stay awake. Right now, my brain buds are too rapidly switching off to even pretend to do any thinking, anyway — Goodnight!


    1. I think the “victim” is a closeted lesbian who was in a consensual romantic relationship with Gayle. And this whole charade with the criminal case is her way of pretending – for her relatives’ sake or for her own- that she’s not gay. Why the state is interfering in this gay drama is a mystery.


      1. “Why the state is interfering in this gay drama”

        I agree with you about the ‘victim’. As for why the state is involved, a major push of modern ‘feminism’ is that women are/should not be accountable for their own sexual decisions (this is patriarchy with a capital PATR).

        In modern feminism, nothing a woman does or says is a reliable indicator of consent. The only reliable indicator is her current unexamined emotional attitude toward the person.

        Weird but that seems to be the case…..


        1. I’d think it would make a difference that they are both women and this was a gay relationship. But apparently putting on a dildo made Newland a de facto man. Although I hear this is a regular component of some lesbian relationships.


        2. yeah this is just an instance where one of these laws intended to punish male sexuality has ‘backfired’ and punished a woman.

          see women attempting to sue and prosecute men for rape by ‘deception’
          and attempts to make it a crime on the law books


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.