Book Notes: Carmen Laforet’s The New Woman

I was taught in college that the famous Spanish author Carmen Laforet wrote nothing after the publication of her mega-bestseller Nothing in 1944. Then I found out that she actually wrote a lot, and it was really good. But what she wrote didn’t conform to the expectations of what the critics and professors thought she should be writing, so it was ignored and consigned to the trash bin of history.

Nothing was written when Laforet was only 23. It’s full of silences and avoidances because she was very young and had no idea what she wanted to say. This allowed critics to read whatever they felt like into those silences. And what they wanted was the standard ultra-progressive stuff. Then it turned out that Laforet wasn’t progressive but a very religious conservative.

This created a huge cognitive dissonance. She’s talented, so she has to be liberal, right? To preserve the illusion, some people ignored everything she wrote after 1944 while others tried to explain it away with the tried and true “what she really wanted to say must have been the exact opposite of what she did say.”

The biggest embarrassment to the believers in the liberal Laforet was her novel The New Woman published in 1955 of which the author was very proud. In the novel, a vain, selfish and immature woman called Paulina has an affair where she cheats on her husband with a relative who’s married to a dying woman. Paulina leaves her husband and child and goes to live on her own while she waits for her lover’s wife to die of leukemia. So far so good. The plot sounds like a regular laudatory piece about women’s liberation in The Atlantic. This could only get more liberal if Paulina left her husband for a woman or decided to become a man.

Instead, Paulina experiences a religious conversion, starts going to church, and slowly and painfully realizes that personal growth can’t consist of jumping from bed to bed. The description of her conversion and attempts to live a Christian life are based on the author’s own conversion to Catholicism. Paulina is a complicated person, and her maturation isn’t easy or quick. You’d think, finally, there’s a female character who experiences growth, yay! But she doesn’t grow in the only approved direction, so the novel and the character had to be forgotten.

I don’t know what’s funnier, seeing the critics try to figure out what Paulina’s conversion must really mean or observing their attempts to “queer” the novel’s author who supposedly managed to be a covert lesbian between giving birth to five children and going to Mass daily. The simple possibility that Paulina really experienced a moment of grace and Laforet was really a sincere Catholic simply doesn’t occur.

Leaving aside all the preconceived garbage and all the inane beliefs in how liberating it must be for all women on the planet to want the exact same thing, the novel offers a pretty profound perspective on what love, marriage, and personal growth mean.

Thankfully, 70 years after the novel’s publication, people seem to be ready to read The New Woman on its own terms. Yesterday, I read an article by a young professor of literature who analyzed the novel without scoffing at religious faith and dismissing marriage and family as horribly oppressive. Not only did he understand the novel, he connected it to its literary and religious sources in St Teresa and St John of the Cross.

I wish I had known about this novel when I wrote about the female Bildungsroman. The New Woman is a very rare example of a successful female Bildung in literature where a woman actually does grow. Usually, these novels are about frustrated development where the female characters end up crushed, dead, or crazy at the end. And here we have somebody who has an intense inner life and manages to mold her life according to her own judgment.

7 thoughts on “Book Notes: Carmen Laforet’s The New Woman

  1. This reminded me of Sigrid Undset’s “Kristin Lavransdatter,” a novel by a Catholic convert (and Nobel Prize winner) about a Catholic woman who is also “a complicated person, and her maturation isn’t easy or quick.” I’m intrigued by the fact that women’s studies classes almost never include Undset’s work – probably because her female characters don’t, as you said, “grow in the right direction.”

    Liked by 1 person

    1. It’s an interesting phenomenon. I’ve read dozens of these women’s development novels by ulrra-liberal, feminist writers, and the characters are always weak, moany, weepy and pathetic. Only in the novels by conservative, religious writers did I find interesting, resilient, deep female characters.

      Somehow, feminism ends up creating very weak women. It’s fascinating.

      Like

      1. “Somehow, feminism ends up creating very weak women.”

        The modern feminist movement developed as a rebellion (“Women’s Liberation”) against perceived male domination, so its partisan warriors all become shell-shocked veterans.

        Religion, for all its silly fantasies, is at least a partnership between the sexes.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. “Somehow, feminism ends up creating very weak women”

        As I never tire of repeating… in the west feminism accomplished almost everything it could in reasonable terms by the late 1980s. The logical next step was to take on misogynistic practices in non-western countries, but for various reasons (here’s looking at you, Edward Said!) they chickened out and it turned inward toward obsessing over emotional trivia (third wave).
        To maintain some kind of idea of mission they had to pretend no progress had been made since the dreaded 1950s…. which meant institutionalizing the idea of women as perpetual, powerless victims.
        We’re still there.

        Liked by 1 person

        1. My favorite thing to observe are feminist scholars who give conference talks about the oppressive, heteronormative marriage and then trot away to make dinner for their very beloved husbands and children.

          All academics I know are in rock-solid happy marriages but they all turn their noses at the idea of monogamous marriage. And nobody is awake to the contradiction.

          Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.