Encouraging Emotional Incontinence

Vance, of course, married the exact opposite of this type of womanhood. An elitist, highly controlled, pole-up-her-ass woman, contemptuous of this country and supercilious of emotionally incontinent proles.

This is not a contradiction. Elites encourage proles to emote in messy, chaotic ways because that’s the best way to keep them as a permanent underclass. This is exactly how Dems reduced blacks to this very role. Now lefty Vance is doing this for whites.

That’s how equity is achieved. The chaotic underclass is finally getting really diverse.

14 thoughts on “Encouraging Emotional Incontinence

    1. “Iโ€™ve always had a soft spot for cranky old ladies who donโ€™t give a F”

      Me too but they mostly don’t yell (yelling is a sign of giving a F), it’s more the cannily accurate deadpan and looks that could curdle milk straight from the cow.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I had the greatest collection of dotty old great-aunts. I don’t believe they’d’ve yelled swear words in public. Wasn’t how they were brought up. But they thought of themselves in poultry metaphor (no spring chicken, tough old bird), were outspoken, fearless, did not tolerate nonsense but loved a good joke, and were completely beyond being shocked or embarrassed by anything. Would definitely have stripped down to skivvies in public IF they thought the situation called for it, but had better options.

        Their funerals were must-not-miss events. I mean, we do funerals right and respectful, and then we have a big potluck and everybody tells their stockpile of stories about the deceased, and we all shriek with laughter until we cry, and send them off to heaven on a palpable cloud of our love. I’m misty-eyed now. I still miss every one of them, and they are what I aspire to, for old age.

        Like

  1. Genuine question: Have you got any any public opinion BY Usha Vance that gives you the basis to make these projections about her? I’ve seen you try to read her mind here many times without providing any link. Where does it come from?

    Like

      1. You have analyzed Vance from every possible angle on this blog. The conflict in Ukraine is something that is clearly important to you, and rightly so. What is interesting to me that you haven’t once talked about Vance’s ostensibly anti-Ukraine position. This is like the case of the dog that didn’t bark in the night. I feel that your antipathy for Vance stems from his Ukraine position but you never mention it. So you’re forced to choose very flimsy pretenses to criticize him (like, who gives a shit about Usha fucking Vance??). That’s how it comes across to me.

        I can understand it. Hating Vance for what he’s said about Ukraine would invite all sorts of criticisms about how immigrants in america engage in politics based upon the interests of their country of birth rather than the country they’ve immigrated to.

        Like

        1. I spoke about this just the other day, though, in “Third-world leftie.” Vance’s profound need to lick the boots of Russians who despise America stems from the same root as the need of the campus protesters to lick the Hamas boots.

          Speaking about countries of birth, though, Vance’s country of birth is the US. Why, then, is he so eager to fellate Russians with their intense hatred of America? We all know I’m emotionally attached to Ukraine. What’s there to discuss? But what is Vance’s reason to be pro-Russia? That’s much more curious because there’s no easily observable reason for it.

          I gave my explanation: third-world leftism. What’s yours? Vance has taken the exact same position as Harris with her “Europeans brought death and destruction into this hemisphere” but he’s saying this about Americans today. Why don’t you notice this? I know why but what’s your explanation?

          Vance blames Russia’s crimes on the US. He wants us once again to feel guilty for something we didn’t do. He wants us to have no global role because we are so flawed, so structurally messed up that until we repair these flaws we shouldn’t even think of telling others what to do. I heard all this back at Yale in 2003. Vance heard at all there, too. I’m now hearing this from a supposedly Republican candidate. My fear is that in 4 years we’ll have both parties running candidates infected with this campus leftism. It is my conservative birthright to notice things. Never again will I give it up. I’m noticing that I heard what Vance is saying before.

          Like

Leave a reply to Clarissa Cancel reply