It Can’t Be

~ Clarissa

Very true. And you can test it yourselves. Try to explain disparate impact to a normie. I’ve tried many times. They think you are inventing, exaggerating, you must have misunderstood something because surely it can’t be, no, it absolutely can’t, come on, ha ha, what makes you think, nah, it’s impossible.

When you start offering evidence, people go into shock and stop absorbing information altogether. It’s the same process every time, on every subject. Euthanasia, immigration, trans issues, BLM – nobody believes what’s happening is really happening.

It’s exactly what I wrote yesterday. The real liberal agenda can’t be revealed. It’s so unnatural, weird and abnormal that a human brain struggles to process it.

Unknown's avatar

Published by Clarissa

28 thoughts on “It Can’t Be”

  1. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it until I’m raptured. The Democrats are Satanists. Seriously, this is not hyperbole. Oh I doubt more than a tiny fraction of a tiny fraction understand what they are, but he is their master no doubt.

    We are told that once we are gone there will be a great deception so great that even the very elect should we have still been here would be deceived. We are also told that Satan is the father of Lies and of Confusion. We are told he is currently running this world, and that once we are gone he will have full control for 7 years. Please note, that while he might be running the world currently, he is operating under restraints until we are gone.

    You are quite correct with what you said. “The real liberal agenda can’t be revealed. It’s so unnatural, weird and abnormal that a human brain struggles to process it.” It is also Spiritual in nature which is why people struggle with it.

    Quite frankly the closer we get to the rapture the more we will see of things like this. Of governments and people doing strange, wicked, or unnatural things and people simply ignoring it as if they can’t see it happening.

    This is another reason I keep telling people they need to come to Jesus so they don’t end up still here when the restrainer is removed. Because when that happens, what we are seeing today will seem like extremely good times.

    • – W

    Like

    Reply

  2. Same as trying to explain that a former president who tried to orchestrate a coup will be a worse person to hand power to again because he’ll be without restraints. They see a buffoon in a safety jacket rising a garbage truck and think “how bad can it get?” Amnesia plus partisanship is a dangerous combination, though one is worse than the other.

    Like

    Reply

      1. You realize that she DID win the democratic nomination, right? After Biden stepped down, and put his weight behind her, every democratic politician had the same right to challenge her to the nomination. That they chose not to is not the definition of a coup. Delegates from each of the relevant states STILL voted to certify her as the nominee before her name could go on the ticket. How is this the same as sending a mob to disrupt a constitutionally mandated process?

        Do you even know how any of these work?

        Like

        Reply

        1. I worry about you sometimes. One minute you’re saying we’re being lied to by others. Another minute you’re passing on your profound ignorance about the democratic process as gospel truth. Is everything alright?

          Like

          Reply

          1. Speaking of process, people should be reminded of the fact that any Democratic presidential candidate other than Biden or Harris would not have been able to legally access all the funding received by the Biden campaign. That, plus the fact that, as in the case of her predecessor, the powers behind the scenes needed an absolute nincompoop to manipulate like putty.

            The democratic process in nation states that have been subverted by globalist elites is a purely theatrical experience: grandiose on the outside, hollow on the inside, like the grandiloquent rhetoric of electioneering slogans that people keep repeating without realising that they are being had.

            If Trump wins, it will not be a victory, just a stay of execution; if Harris wins, the West will get just that much closer to the triumph of the WEF project.

            Liked by 2 people

            Reply

            1. Best case scenario: Trump: we get a reprieve for a couple years, maybe a chance to hack some of the tentacle infestation out of the fed-level institutions. But no matter who wins, economy looks bleak and whoever’s in office will get blamed for it. But possibly we can avoid getting into any exciting new wars. That’d be nice.

              Best case scenario: Harris: the chickens come home to roost on the appropriate watch. Economy does what the economy is going to do anyway, both parties crack up due to lack of public confidence, and by 2028 we have an entirely different range of options– maybe as many as six or eight viable parties in the ring, trying to hash out a vision for the country that is something other than Team Rich People A vs. Team Rich People B at the expense of the rest of us.

              I think both of those are a long shot, and the economy’s going to be a rough ride no matter who wins, because that’s been a long time in the making and isn’t avoidable.

              We’ll see.

              Like

              Reply

            2. People went to the primaries and voted. Then all of a sudden, the candidate they voted for was removed and a new one was sprung on them. And this is supposed to be true democracy. It’s a joke.

              Like

              Reply

              1. He was removed? Pray, how was he removed?

                By the 25th Amendment? By Impeachment? By assassination? None of the above.

                So what did they do? They went on TV and suggested that he consider dropping out, which he did, in the interest of his party and his country. And for his own good. As a result, the prospects of victory for his party improved, not just for his deputy but also down-ballot politicians. And he gets to keep his legacy intact. So please, tell us how he was “removed”.

                If Republicans had gone on TV to pressure Trump to consider dropping out after his felony conviction (which they absolutely should have) and he had listened to them and given a better Republican a chance to win, would that have been a “removal”?

                Was it a removal when Nixon listened to the bleak prospects of his impeachment and chose to resign?

                Do words mean things?

                Like

        2. Politician, schmolitician. The people were deprived of their right to vote for her or not in the primaries. Your narrative is like what we heard in the USSR. The higher-ups decided who your candidate is and your input isn’t needed.

          As for “sending a mob”, please offer a quote from Trump when he said that.

          Liked by 1 person

          Reply

          2. If everything you see in the US reminds you of the USSR, maybe it says something about your own vision of the country you live in! Not quite different from the “deplorables” or “garbage” comment either.

            People DID have a right to vote for Kamala, which they’re doing RIGHT NOW across the country. If Democratic primary voters shared your view that they have been deprived of something, wouldn’t they’d be voting in droves against her now? So why is she winning? Why did all the polls suddenly put her over Trump as soon as she won the nomination?

            In whose interest, really, is this your Shakespearan-doth-protest-too-much vituperation?

            Like

            Reply

            1. People did have a right to vote for Kamala. They mostly didn’t when they had other options. It is worth asking more questions about why she is getting the support that she is. I’m on the ground in a deep blue area and there are several reasons observable here.

              Vote blue no matter who. Democrats are out to save democracy, unlike those insurrectionists who tried to hold a coup last time.
              First woman president. I’m on the right side of history and I’m not misogynistic like those other people.
              Trump is evil (insert epithet of choice here). He must be stopped even if his opponent is somewhat lackluster.
              A vote for Democrats will bring people together and end the divisive rhetoric driven by Trump and the Republicans.
              Trump/Republicans will abolish abortion rights, put women’s lives at risk, and make them second class citizens. I want to support the future of the women who are important to me and vote against him no matter who the alternative is.

              Probably the weirdest part of my experience over the last several years is finding who is vulnerable to this kind of propaganda and to what extent. I had a higher opinion of some people that I would rather have kept.
              For what it is worth, there is a difference between despising the people who publish and promote this type of propaganda and those who are duped by it. One who presumes to teach should be held to a higher standard.

              Liked by 1 person

              Reply

              1. I have been seeing Democrats for Trump signs around, which both hilarious and, if it isn’t a troll, intriguing. Is it opening the permission structure to act outside the mass but not lose identity altogether?

                Liked by 1 person

  4. From a source that libtards consider as the Bible.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2024/07/21/why-biden-dropped-out-00170106

    “Nancy made clear that they could do this the easy way or the hard way,” said one Democrat familiar with private conversations who was granted anonymity to speak candidly. “She gave them three weeks of the easy way. It was about to be the hard way.”

    Anyone who claims that the installation of Kamala was anything but a total insult to the democratic primary process is an insane retard.

    Liked by 2 people

    Reply

    1. Do you have any Democrats complaining that Kamala is the candidate, after getting Biden’s endorsement? Or are you complaining for yourself? If you’re voting for Trump, then why do you care how Democrats choose their representative? We are not complaining, and we’re voting for her.

      Like

      Reply

      2. We are not complaining, and we’re voting for her.

        Shut the fuck up lol. Who’s this “we”? Haven’t you said before you’re not american? You should do a better job of keeping track of your lies.

        Liked by 1 person

        Reply

      3. Democrats also not complaining about foreign governments using their personal info to fraudulently make campaign donations through ActBlue.

        Are you OK being the side that is a-OK with fraud and chicanery, as long as you get the results you want?

        Like

        Reply

  5. Is this appropriate for a political rally?

    Is this real?

    If it’s real, it’s proof that Trump is definitely better at working a mike than the guy who opened up for him at a rally last week. As a comedy bit, this kills.

    Kamala could never. Biden cannot. JD cannot. Pence would have a heart attack. Walz needs the two drink minimum at comedy clubs for a light chuckle. (I don’t think this is shopped b/c I’ve never heard of AI making anyone funnier.)

    NSFW, I am not kidding (from 2:50 onwards)

    https://x.com/benwikler/status/1852546912370544659

    Like

    Reply

Leave a comment