I can bet any amount of money that there is no liberal on my campus who reads more than I do. I understand that he’s talking about general statistical trends. But trends get extrapolated onto individuals all the time. Many times when I’ve said I’m a conservative, people with maybe 1/10 of my readings started trying to condescend to me.
Since Zygmunt Bauman died, I have not found any remotely interesting ideas originating on the left. Nothing, zip, zilch, a vacuum.
Clarissa's Blog 
If you’ve been on substack for a while, it has been widely noted there, that while conservative/right-oriented writers usually build up a following very gradually, every time a big-name leftie joins substack, they instantly have a follower/subscriber count that stretches the bounds of credibility.
“Lefties are more well-read” is not the only interpretation one could reasonably apply to that chart.
Just as easily: conservative writers on substack have organic followings, while lefties have a massive organized machine that games popularity numbers and financially rewards their propagandists.
-ethyl
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly. Who knows what people actually read on there? This would be more interesting if we had actual reading counts. Following somebody out of group allegiance is a sign of nothing.
LikeLike