If there ever was a disappointing book of literary criticism, it’s this one. It has a really great introduction that promises a lot, builds up your expectations, offers tons of interesting questions, and all this only to deliver the earth – shattering idea that. . . the characters of the late 18th – early 19th century Spanish literature don’t examine their privilege. The bastards.
I’d think it would be much were worthy of attention if the early Romantics did examine privilege (because anything so out of character and so misplaced should definitely be analyzed) but this scholar chooses to reduce his analysis of the most prominent Romantics of Spain to the ridiculously obvious conclusion that they didn’t. The conclusion to Properties of Modernity just repeats the word “privilege” as many times as possible without even trying to venture into any other subject of inquiry.
I’m wondering if we are to expect a book of literary criticism that chides Renaissance artists for not placing trigger warnings on their art.
And hey, I know this scholar. I’ve met him, we belong to the same intellectual tradition within Hispanic Studies that places the beginning of the Spanish Romanticism in the 1780s. He was a very promising scholar but then he went to Berkeley and that was the end of him. It all became about privilege – scratching and real literary analysis died.
Author: Michael Iarocci
Title: Properties of Modernity
Language: English
My rating: 2 out of 10 because the intro is very good