
Rate this:
Share this:
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
“gender diverse dogs”…
This seems like they’re just fucking with us now seeing how much shit we’ll lap up and ask for more (or profess ignorance “I don’t understand…” while not challenging them).
It is not the job of children’s cartoons to expose children to “gender diverse” anything….. what freaks.
LikeLiked by 2 people
“Dogs of color”? That sounds wildly offensive.
These people have lost all touch with reality. Poor, stupid freaks.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Watch: they will next introduce a “black” doberman, a “hispanic” chihuahua… and get pilloried for it in the media and never air on television again. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Why is everything in the passive voice? Who exactly is doing this alleged criticizing? This is nuts.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You can freely criticise anything at all if you have no investment in it or wish it to be destroyed.
How is this different from anything else these people criticise?
It’s even easier when the parties doing the criticising aren’t named and are nebulous entities hiding behind the journalist’s use of passive voice.
My favourite TV show of all time happens to be “Hogan’s Heroes”, but I don’t criticise it for not having enough Nazis or for featuring oddly named places such as Braunschweiger Pass.
Just remember, when watching a comedy, laugh at the Nazis instead of collaborating with them, uninvested critics!
What’s next, the TV show “Baa Baa Black Sheep” didn’t have enough Japanese in it? 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person