The EU today introduced the new requirement for all new cars registered in Europe to have installed cameras filming the driver’s face.

The system is called Advanced Driver Distraction Warning, ADDW, and is part of the EU’s General Safety Regulation.

The camera tracks the driver’s gaze, head movements and attention.

According to the regulations, the system must be active from 20 kilometers per hour. At lower speeds, it should be able to warn if the driver looks away for too long, while the requirements become stricter at higher speeds.

Chirbes explains in his diaries that all these measures are aimed at infantilizing people. And the purpose of doing that is economic. People who are infantilized are likelier to accept the childish lifestyles that they are offered. Living in rented apartments with roommates instead of owning. Serial dating and situationships instead of marriage and children. A succession of crappy part-time gigs instead of a career. Adults are habituated to seeing themselves as eternal children so that they would accept the economy which deprives them of every marker of adulthood. This is achieved through the concept of safety. What always was a normal adult life is perceived as unsafe.

The social contract between an individual and the state is transformed. The state no longer has to guarantee an acceptable standard of living and maintain a social structure in which one can transition through the appropriate stages of life. Now, the state’s role becomes limited to creating an illusion of safety through a succession of fussy, infantilizing control measures.

Chirbes would say that what is being announced in this safe driving measure is yet another drop in the standard of living for which this is in preparation. Something is going on economically behind the scenes. Back in the day, Chirbes became famous in Spain for predicting the collapse of the real estate market and the incoming crisis of 2008, at a time when everybody else in the country thought that the economy was doing great. His instinct was always to look at the economic causes of things. I think that that instinct is what is missing from a lot of our analysis of everything we observe.

2 responses to “The Purpose of Safetyism”

  1.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    Safteyism is not just imposed by the government. It is also demanded by the population. In the US, Democrats are terrified of people with legal guns (including police and ICE agents, but not only them). Republicans are terrified of criminals (including illegal immigrants, but not only them). Children go to schools which are barricaded like prisons because of the small chance of a shooting. Fear of misfortunes which have extremely low probability makes us dysfunctional, and a vicious cycle of anxiety reinforces itsef because moods are contagious. We should bring back courage as a virtue. When someone is indifferent to danger we should call them “brave” and not “stupid”, and when someone is very cautious we should call them “cowardly” and not “smart”.

    This fear is a form of greed. As you say “what always was a normal adult life is perceived as unsafe” because people refuse to accept limits on their comfort, health, longevity.

    -P

    Liked by 1 person

  2. oldcowboy3 Avatar
    oldcowboy3

    Fear in humans is normal, often rational, and generally larger in females, particularly those with younger children. The real danger is when political forces of either the right or the left, deliberately instill that protective intinct for ideological reasons. At this point in time, the left in the West is trying to use fear to curb our discussions and control our thinking. Elon may have briefly saved us by freeing Twitter to X, but the same dark forces are trying to limit/control debate using the usual horseshit²that is of course to “protect the children” ;-D

    elon ,

    Like

Leave a comment