Truman Capote’s Breakfast at Tiffany‘s is the first book on my Classics Club list that has disappointed me. I can’t even say it’s bad because this short novel is too trivial and meaningless to rise to the level of badness. I have absolutely no idea what possessed the author to explore one of the most tired old plots in the history of humanity as late as 1958. Novels narrated by males who are puzzled and attracted / repulsed by a prostitute abound. What is the point of writing yet another one if you can;t contribute anything new to the subject?

I understand, of course, that nobody is likely to invent a new plot these days. But you have got to bring something new even to the most exploited old theme. Capote doesn’t manage to do that, however. He rewrites Abbé Prévost, Kuprin, Zola et al. but his incapacity to rise to their level either artistically or ideologically makes Breakfast at Tiffany‘s nothing but a sad, pale parody.

The book I purchased also contained three short stories, so I decided to read them in order to give Capote a chance to redeem himself in my eyes. And what do you think? The very first story yet again discussed female prostitution in the same saccharine, cloying way as the short novel. I don’t know what made Capote, a gay man, so obsessed with female prostitution but this fixation definitely detracts from the quality of his writing.

If you read the novel and liked it, do share what it is that you enjoyed about it.

19 responses to “Classics Club #8: Truman Capote’s Breakfast at Tiffany’s”

  1. el Avatar
    el

    I loved “In Cold Blood”, a nonfiction book, by him a lot. May be, if you wish to give him a try, you can pick ICB instead. A Russian blogger I mentioned wrote about it too:
    http://l-eriksson.livejournal.com/463644.html

    I was interested in psychology of everybody.

    Like

    1. bloggerclarissa Avatar

      I totally should have put In Cold Blood on my Classics List instead of this. That was my mistake. But I never could have hoped to have only winners on this quite long list. Every book I read before it was good, so it was time for a dud. 🙂

      Like

  2. hkatz Avatar

    I haven’t read this book, but I started watching the movie adaptation from the 1960s, and I couldn’t finish it. The movie was vaguely nauseating – a mix of different elements that didn’t go well together (especially a cringeworthy performance by Mickey Rooney as a Japanese neighbor).

    I read In Cold Blood in high school and enjoyed it but I don’t remember much beyond that.

    Like

    1. bloggerclarissa Avatar

      “especially a cringeworthy performance by Mickey Rooney as a Japanese neighbor”

      – I just imagined this and cringed, too. 🙂 🙂

      Like

    2. Ol. Avatar

      Moooooon riiiiiiiver…

      Like

      1. bloggerclarissa Avatar

        Is the song from that movie??

        The song is beautiful.

        Like

      2. Ol. Avatar

        Watch the movie, then! But fast forward on Rooney’s Japanese vignette.

        Like

  3. cliff arroyo Avatar

    I’ve never actually been tempted to read this book, but it was my impression that Holly wasn’t technically a prostitute. She was on the sex for compensation spectrum but didn’t engage in the simple sex for cash transactions that define ‘true’ prostitutes (for me).

    “I don’t know what made Capote, a gay man, so obsessed with female prostitution”

    My best guess: A combination of jealousy (combined with an over estimation of the quality of men that frequent prostitutes) and curiosity about the mechanics of the straight sexual dynamic – especially the sex for resources trade that underlines so much of it.

    Like

    1. bloggerclarissa Avatar

      “She was on the sex for compensation spectrum but didn’t engage in the simple sex for cash transactions that define ‘true’ prostitutes (for me).”

      – Sex for compensation is prostitution. 🙂 “Prostitution is the business or practice of providing sexual services to another person in return for payment.”

      “My best guess: A combination of jealousy (combined with an over estimation of the quality of men that frequent prostitutes) ”

      – That’s what I think, too. The author is fantasizing about how great it is to have sex with many men.

      “the mechanics of the straight sexual dynamic – especially the sex for resources trade that underlines so much of it.”

      – This sounds like you are saying that only gay people have sex for pleasure. 🙂 🙂

      Like

  4. cliff arroyo Avatar

    “Sex for compensation is prostitution”

    I don’t think it’s quite that simple. By that definition you could say that a stay at home housewife who can’t have children is a prostitute (since sex is definitely part of the reason she’s being supported).

    I think it’s a spectrum – at one end is the straightforward open transaction (X amount for a half and half X+ amount for a round the world etc) at another extreme there is the classic courtesan where money does change hands but never in a direct sex act for cash way. At the fringes of that you relationships between a much richer partner and a poorer one where the poorer one has access to a higher lifestyle as long as the sexual relationship lasts.

    “This sounds like you are saying that only gay people have sex for pleasure”

    That would be like saying only straight people directly pay for sex. The existence of one element (pleasure) doesn’t preclude the existence of another (commerce, whether open and acknowledged or not).

    That said it occurs to me that I’ve never heard of one kind of prostituion.
    Men paying for sex with women or men is widely known and women paying for sex with men happens too. But I’ve never heard of lesbian prostitution. Does it happen or is it a market niche waiting for a savy entrepreneur? (not me, I hasten to add)

    Like

    1. bloggerclarissa Avatar

      “By that definition you could say that a stay at home housewife who can’t have children is a prostitute (since sex is definitely part of the reason she’s being supported).”

      – Exactly.

      “I think it’s a spectrum – at one end is the straightforward open transaction (X amount for a half and half X+ amount for a round the world etc) at another extreme there is the classic courtesan where money does change hands but never in a direct sex act for cash way. At the fringes of that you relationships between a much richer partner and a poorer one where the poorer one has access to a higher lifestyle as long as the sexual relationship lasts.”

      = We all know that I’m judgmental. 🙂 To me, this is all prostitution. I see absolutely no difference in any of these acts. The only difference is that honest prostitution is something I can respect. But when people sell sex for money yet pretend it isn’t prostitution and they are somehow better than people who offer sex at truck stops, that I cannot respect.

      Like

  5. Leah Jane Avatar
    Leah Jane

    “But I’ve never heard of lesbian prostitution.”
    Just check out Fetlife some time. There’s a huge number of older women, some single, some in miserable hetero marriages, who seek out younger ladies with whom to explore their sexuality, usually for money, dinners, or some other form of compensation. Or lesbian couples who seek out a younger companion to add to their love nest. I’ve been offered many times to join such arrangements, but never took it up.

    And yeah, Clarissa, I’ve never read the book, but the movie is downright nauseating. I also loved In Cold Blood, so add me to that choir telling you that that would have been a better choice.

    Like

    1. cliff arroyo Avatar

      Ah, my faith (if that’s the right word) in human nature is restored.

      Like

  6. Classics Club | Clarissa's Blog Avatar

    […] I never read anything by Truman Capote. Here, I said it. My dark secret is out. I will read Breakfast at Tiffany’s as one of my […]

    Like

  7. cliff arroyo Avatar

    “Breakfast at Tiffany’s”

    I just recently read this (the same volume you had with three extra stories) and so I checked to see if you had written about it….

    Some thoughts off the top of my head:

    You began and ended with the prostitute aspect of Holly (I still don’t think it’s that cut and dried*) but I really don’t think that’s the main point of the novela. What I took from it was the exploration of a personality type many of us have experienced – someone who exists ouside the normal order and has their own automonous inner code of conduct that outsiders are not privy to. They swoosh into your life (not necessarily in a romantic way) and eventually swoosh out and you never know what happened to them and sometimes you wonder about them and what they’re up to. Pretty girls are a dime a dozen, very few have the life force that make them memorable.

    If you look at the chronology of her character she starts out in a nameless middle of nowhere and who travels on her own to a named middle of nowhere where she marries an older man and where she starts learning about the world before moving on to Hollywood, New York, Brazil, Argentina and (presumably) Africa and then… into the bush. What I also noticed was how… untouched she was by the outer world. She occasionally had misgivings but her only real emotional reaction is to the death of her brother. The carving that sets of the reminiscences is also something of a cliche – she is ultimately unknowable and all anyone has is their own interpretation of her.

    I don’t think it’s great art or anything like that but there’s a reason it has resonated with so many people (beyond the overrated movie).

    Two of the other stories are about desire for a man, House of Flowers is less about prostitution than the protagonist’s love for her husband (prostitution doesn’t touch her, maybe because she doesn’t have the emotional intellectual resources to get it) but she feels neglect from her husband in a real and visceral way. The story in prison is also the same theme – the older prisoner’s not exactly sexual desire for the younger one who, literally, gets away. The diamond guitar is a metaphor for his Holly-like charisma.

    I enjoyed the Christmas story, it skirted sentimentality (and romanticizing a dirt poor existence) but managed to just stay clear.

    Now I’m wondering how many of his works are about a meeker or milder character in some kind of thrall to a more charismatic one.

    *btw, do you still think that childless stay at home wives are prostitutes?

    Like

    1. Clarissa Avatar

      This is an interesting reading, but to be honest, I don’t remember that much depth in this character. The tragic aspect of a prostitute’s life that we can see in Tolstoy and Kuprin was completely absent. I think the issue here is that since gay men tend to be extremely creative, a large part of our creative output belongs to them. They are, of necessity, in a complex relationship to womanhood. If we look at the fashion world, for example, almost the entirety of high fashion is created for women who are not really women. The fashions are beautiful. They’re stunning, but they are a gay man’s parody of femaleness. They are created by men who don’t like women. And it’s a similar thing in literature. Tolstoy, who was obviously not gay, depicts his prostitute in The Resurrection as a complex, tragic character. I strongly believe that she is his most interesting character. As a reader, I don’t despise her. To the contrary, I see greatness in her plight. Truman Capote’s’ Holly, on the other hand, is repulsive to me. She’s not entirely human. She’s more like an insect, which I think is what women are to the gay author.

      Bringing the conversation back to Chirbes, because why not: the novel that he was the most proud of is written from a female perspective, and it’s the one novel of his I really hate.

      Like

      1. cliff arroyo Avatar

        “the fashion world, for example, almost the entirety of high fashion is created for women who are not really women”

        Fashion is about creating temporary, disposable looks. I think it’s less about not liking women but more about not wanting to create anything with lasting power. Like the old saying: “Fashion is ugliness so calculated that it has to be changed every few months”.

        Like

        1. Clarissa Avatar

          I know a woman who fell in love with a Balenciaga coat. It’s a stunning coat. She went to great lengths to save money for it. Finally, she bought it, put it on… and it looks hideous on her. This woman is very skinny, so she thought the coat would work. It’s her size and everything. But the coat presupposes unnaturally long legs. Normal-length human legs make it look ugly.

          Sadly, instead of returning the coat, the woman decided to alter it. That messed it up completely. So she ended up with an $8,000 utterly unusable garment.

          Like

          1. cliff arroyo Avatar

            “she ended up with an $8,000 utterly unusable garment”

            The system works….

            Like

Leave a comment