Sign up for a free recipe e-book →

Clarissa's Blog

Logical Result

Published by

Clarissa

on

OK, I take back my skepticism over the Handmaid’s Tale fears.

Jokes aside, it’s easy to blame California or wokesters but we are all at fault. I’ve been saying for years that this is a culture where parental whims, no matter how bizarre and bad for the kids, are never criticized. We do not believe that parenting and its results are in any way connected. And if they aren’t, what’s the big deal of getting rid of moms to please a bunch of whiny gay dudes? It won’t have any effect because parenting never does.

This is only going to get worse until we find the courage to get rid of our taboo on holding parents accountable. And I say it as a parent myself.

7 responses to “Logical Result”

  1. Avi Avatar
    Avi

    “California moves to provide surrogates to gay male couples in the name of fertility equality”
    Meaning that all gay men will have a guaranteed right to a state-salaried surrogate womb?
    And people still think that Democrats are the party of gender equality?
    This is a man (Gavin Newsom) guaranteeing access to a woman’s body to other men. Talk about dystopia…

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
    1. Pen Avatar
      Pen

      Meaning that insurance can’t deny coverage for surrogacy and related medical care based on the couples’ actual infertility status (typically you need to have tried a certain number of fertility treatment cycles, which obviously gay men cannot do). It doesn’t guarantee a surrogate. However, it does increase the chance of financial coercion and emotional manipulation, which are already rampant when it comes to surrogates.

      Unfortunately a lot of the states that don’t have laws outright banning surrogacy don’t really have decent protections for surrogate rights.

      Like

      Reply
      1. Clarissa Avatar
        Clarissa

        I couldn’t care less about surrogates’ rights. These are horrible people, absolute monsters. I care about the rights of the children. Children shouldn’t be an object of sale, period. This should all be outlawed.

        Liked by 1 person

        Reply
        1. Clarissa Avatar
          Clarissa

          Leaving that aside, though, these men aren’t infertile. Why is an untruth being promoted by the government?

          Gayness is either a disease or it isn’t. So much effort was put into convincing everybody it isn’t (and rightfully so) only to turn around and called it a medical condition.

          Liked by 1 person

          Reply
  2. cliff arroyo Avatar
    cliff arroyo

    OT: In other news, John Hopkins has found a way to describe lesbians without using that icky word ‘women’ (ewwwww)….

    https://twitter.com/OliLondonTV/status/1668337775538733056

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
    1. Clarissa Avatar
      Clarissa

      Incredible. It’s now actually worse than in Simone de Beauvoir’s times. At least back then you could say the word “woman “

      Like

      Reply
      1. cliff arroyo Avatar
        cliff arroyo

        “you could say the word “woman “”

        I’m just worried about all the pop songs that have to be rewritten….

        “I am non-man hear me roar”
        “I’m every non-man”
        “A non-man in love”
        “Non-man to non-man”
        And of course the classic “When a man loves a non-man”…..

        More seriously, there’s also the aspect that under this classification…. children are also non-men…. the demons of the elite really want to normalize pedophilia….

        Like

        Reply

Leave a comment

A conservative literary critic and college professor

Recent posts