Last night we went to watch the first part of the last part in the Hunger Games series. Before the movie, we finally paid a visit to the new local gastropub.
“We have become so Americanized!” I told N. “We eat an enormous meal and then go watch Hunger Games.”
The gastropub served us some really disappointing pea soup because the chef believes that it’s OK to use canned peas to make pea soup. Today I will be making a real Canadian split pea soup to erase the bad taste of those canned peas from my mouth. The fish tacos, however, were sensational. And the scallops were not bad at all. There were some fans of mine among the patrons and they kept telling the waiter to say hi and send messages in Spanish. This made me feel glad that I’m no longer a drinking person.
The movie proved to be very good, so thank you, everybody who recommended. It is quite an achievement to make such a good, solid movie out of the weakest book in the trilogy. Of course, the movie would have benefited from reducing it by at least 30 minutes. There are several superfluous scenes like, for instance, the scene on the staircase. It introduces no new insights into the characters: yes, the mother is useless, the sister is a damsel in permanent distress, and the protagonist is a teenage drama queen, but we’ve known all this since the first scene of the first movie in the series. There are also way too many scenes where the camera zooms on the protagonist’s face, making the viewers privy to the actress’s hopeless struggle to convey emotion. As a result, she just looks severely constipated, and the viewers get bored.
Judging from the nearly empty theater – and that’s on a Saturday night! – the movie is doing much worse at the box office than the previous two parts of the series. This is not surprising, given that there are no Hunger Games in this part of the trilogy, and the Hunger Games were what made the series original and attracted viewers and readers. Another reason for the series’ downward trajectory is that the economic well-being of the viewers grows, the recession is receding into memory, and the viewers don’t identify with what they are seeing on the screen any longer. (Not that they ever had reason to identify, coming to the movies after enormous, delicious meals, but it isn’t like these things are ever reasonable.)
But here is something you probably didn’t know: in Russia, the ticket sales of Mockingjay, Part 1 are 15% higher than the ticket sales of Catching Fire (the second and the strongest film in the series so far.) Russia is at war, and its people need inspiration to keep up the military effort. I find it very interesting to trace how the audiences’ response to entertainment differs and why.
In Germany, ticket sales are up as well. That was to be expected since most of the action in Mockingjay, Part 1 is set underground, and Germans could never resist subterranean imagery. They will watch anything as long as it happens in a tunnel or a shaft.
In terms of acting skills, the generational chasm between the older, more seasoned actors and the younger, really vapid ones is very distracting. When Julianne Moore, Woody Harrelson or Stanley Tucci appear in the scenes next to the actors who play Katniss, Peeta or that other guy (Gale, or what is his name?), the younger actors disappear completely. The scene where Julianne Moore is talking to Jennifer Lawrence is extremely unfortunate since Lawrence is completely washed out by the striking and even somewhat artistically gifted Moore.
What’s great about the movie is the abundance of very expensive, very impressive special effects. They make the movie very entertaining and just a good way to spend a relaxing, escapist couple of hours.
I’m now considering going to see Interstellar in 4D because that has got to be even more escapist.