Middle schoolers who join debate teams are warned to avoid the “that’s just like Hitler” argument because it’s intellectually vacuous and morally unsustainable. Reaching out for an easy, tear-jerking analogy is a sign of an impotent mind.
Lazy, primitive brains love nothing as much as they do analogy. They dismiss any new information that reaches them with an, “Oh, it’s just like X” because absorbing anything new is work, and it’s much easier to sift through a limited stock of trivia tidbits than try to learn. The Hitler Analogy is the easiest one because every ignoramus on the planet feels hugely knowledgeable about the Holocaust on the basis of having heard that something vaguely bad might have happened and can be used to shame people you don’t like.
This morning, I tried scrolling through my news feed but all I saw, in about 30 articles in a row, was the comparison of Syrian refugees with European Jews in 1938. The analogy is both unsustainable and offensive. It’s also been done to death, it sheds no light on the understanding of anything, yet people repeat it with the insistence of robots who’ve had no other function programmed into them.
Have you noticed, though, that for just-like-Holocausters everything is as bad as the Holocaust except for the Holocaust? They have no sympathy for Jews but every sympathy for just-like-Jews. (One of the just-like-Holocausters in my blogroll, for instance, was the “tender – hearted Nazis” fellow I quoted yesterday.)
The reason is that their attachment to just-like-Holocausting does not only serve the purpose of faking an understanding where there is none. It also helps them trivialize the Holocaust and turn it into an ordinary, mundane occurrence which is “just like” everything else in the world.
6 thoughts on “Holocaust Studies: Just-like-Holocausters”
Clarissa, You expressed irritation is always so edifying: Thank you!
Thank you for the compliment. 🙂
I meant to write “Your expressed irritation …”.
The Holocaust was a rather extreme and unusual case of racially motivated genocide. That said it does share some crucial similarities with the Armenian and Rwandan genocides. There are still considerable differences, but the similarities shouldn’t be ignored. For other events the Holocaust remains rather distinctive in its fundamentals. I don’t like the term unique because I don’t think it was in its most important points. But, it certainly was unusually extreme even among most other cases of genocide.
As I said, I have no problem with people doing a scholarly analysis of the Rwandan genocide and the Holocaust. I object to statements like, “Oh, I stubbed my toe, this is just like the Holocaust.” Scholars should do the work they need to do but people whose knowledge is so vague as to be limited to “Holocaust was something bad” should go learn more and, until then, stay silent on the subject.